LCAP vs. OILK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LCAP (Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCAP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Principal, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. LCAP is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past year, LCAP returned 27.27% vs 56.95% for OILK. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. LCAP charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.

Performance

LCAP vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCAP achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 61.09% return.

LCAP

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 3.30%
• YTD: 12.02%
• 6M: 11.68%
• 1Y: 27.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OILK

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: -2.15%
• YTD: 61.09%
• 6M: 56.40%
• 1Y: 56.95%
• 3Y*: 18.39%
• 5Y*: 17.28%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCAP vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LCAP Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF	12.02%	18.16%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	61.09%	-10.52%

Correlation

The correlation between LCAP and OILK is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.16

The correlation between LCAP and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to -0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LCAP vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LCAP	OILK
Technology	36.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	13.3%	100.0%
Financial Services	12.5%	-
Communication Services	11.0%	-
Healthcare	9.3%	-
Industrials	6.1%	-
Energy	3.8%	-
Utilities	3.2%	-
Basic Materials	1.6%	-
Real Estate	1.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

LCAP vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCAP

LCAP Risk / Return Rank: 65
LCAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
LCAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
LCAP Omega Ratio Rank: 63
LCAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
LCAP Martin Ratio Rank: 67

OILK

OILK Risk / Return Rank: 55
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 54
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCAP vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCAP	OILK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	1.99	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	2.51	+0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.33	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	3.30	-0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.03	6.67	+5.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCAP vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCAP Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCAP and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCAP	OILK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	1.99	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.59	0.11	+1.48

Drawdowns

LCAP vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCAP drawdown since its inception was -11.31%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCAP and OILK.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCAP	OILK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.31%	-83.76%	+72.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.32%	-17.35%	+8.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-5.49%	+4.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.61%	-32.60%	+30.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	8.57%	-6.30%

Volatility

LCAP vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) is 2.98%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.52%. This indicates that LCAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCAP	OILK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.98%	10.52%	-7.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.16%	23.32%	-13.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.82%	28.82%	-16.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.88%	30.13%	-13.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.88%	35.97%	-19.09%

LCAP vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCAP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCAP vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

LCAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than OILK's 8.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LCAP Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF	0.10%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	8.34%	4.79%	3.11%	5.80%	17.32%	68.82%	0.13%	0.94%	0.58%	6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCAP and OILK in my portfolio?

LCAP and OILK have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCAP or OILK?

OILK has higher volatility (10.52%) compared to LCAP (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCAP dropped -11.31% vs OILK's -83.76%.

Which ETF is better, LCAP or OILK?

On 1-year performance, OILK leads with 56.95% vs 27.27% for LCAP. On fees, LCAP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, LCAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LCAP or OILK?

Over the 1-year period, OILK has performed better with a 56.95% return vs 27.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCAP or OILK?

LCAP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LCAP or OILK?

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 0.10% for LCAP.

What is the main difference between LCAP and OILK?

LCAP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Principal and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for LCAP and 0.68% for OILK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.