PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCAP vs. FTAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCAP vs. FTAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCAP achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly higher than FTAG's 6.79% return.


LCAP

1D
-1.40%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
9.75%
6M
8.45%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTAG

1D
-1.13%
1M
-3.74%
YTD
6.79%
6M
6.97%
1Y
8.43%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
0.85%
10Y*
5.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCAP vs. FTAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LCAP and FTAG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCAP vs. FTAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCAP
LCAP Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
LCAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCAP Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
LCAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCAP Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FTAG
FTAG Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FTAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAG Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCAP vs. FTAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCAPFTAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.11

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

0.89

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.19

2.04

+8.15

LCAP vs. FTAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCAP Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the FTAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCAP and FTAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCAP vs. FTAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCAP drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, smaller than the maximum FTAG drawdown of -90.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCAP and FTAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCAPFTAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.78%

-90.89%

+79.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-9.56%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-79.35%

+76.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.68%

-71.25%

+69.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

4.15%

-1.81%

Volatility

LCAP vs. FTAG - Volatility Comparison

Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) at 3.95%. This indicates that LCAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCAPFTAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

3.95%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.79%

10.93%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

14.17%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.98%

17.41%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

19.60%

-2.62%

LCAP vs. FTAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCAP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FTAG's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCAP vs. FTAG - Dividend Comparison

LCAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than FTAG's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
1.42%1.39%2.89%3.68%1.77%1.58%1.72%2.33%2.16%1.26%0.61%1.35%
LCAP
Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF
0.10%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCAP and FTAG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCAP has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to FTAG (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCAP dropped -11.78% vs FTAG's -90.89%.

On 1-year performance, LCAP leads with 23.78% vs 8.43% for FTAG. On fees, LCAP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FTAG has been the lower-risk option at 3.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LCAP has performed better with a 23.78% return vs 8.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LCAP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTAG.

FTAG has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.10% for LCAP.

They also come from different issuers: Principal and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for LCAP and 0.70% for FTAG.

LCAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCAP and FTAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer