PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCAL.L vs. MWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCAL.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF - Acc (LCAL.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LCAL.L is traded in GBP, while MWRD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MWRD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


LCAL.L

1D
-1.09%
1M
12.92%
YTD
32.38%
6M
35.00%
1Y
63.67%
3Y*
23.36%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*

MWRD.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCAL.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LCAL.L
Lyxor MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF - Acc
32.38%24.10%13.67%0.95%-11.42%-4.08%24.20%14.12%-7.85%
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World
0.00%0.00%-1.27%17.50%-9.18%24.39%11.85%23.29%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between LCAL.L and MWRD.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2018

0.52

The correlation between LCAL.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LCAL.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LCAL.L
MWRD.L

Technology

45.2%
24.7%

Financial Services

16.4%
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
10.5%

Industrials

7.1%
10.6%

Communication Services

6.9%
7.5%

Healthcare

3.8%
12.4%

Basic Materials

3.0%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
6.7%

Energy

2.1%
4.4%

Real Estate

1.3%
2.4%

Utilities

1.0%
2.4%

Technology

LCAL.L
45.2%
MWRD.L
24.7%

Financial Services

LCAL.L
16.4%
MWRD.L
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

LCAL.L
10.5%
MWRD.L
10.5%

Industrials

LCAL.L
7.1%
MWRD.L
10.6%

Communication Services

LCAL.L
6.9%
MWRD.L
7.5%

Healthcare

LCAL.L
3.8%
MWRD.L
12.4%

Basic Materials

LCAL.L
3.0%
MWRD.L
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

LCAL.L
2.9%
MWRD.L
6.7%

Energy

LCAL.L
2.1%
MWRD.L
4.4%

Real Estate

LCAL.L
1.3%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Utilities

LCAL.L
1.0%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCAL.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCAL.L
LCAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
LCAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LCAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

MWRD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCAL.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF - Acc (LCAL.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCAL.LMWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.54

LCAL.L vs. MWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCAL.LMWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

Drawdowns

LCAL.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCAL.LMWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

Volatility

LCAL.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCAL.LMWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.01%

LCAL.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCAL.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LCAL.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCAL.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LCAL.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for LCAL.L.

LCAL.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. LCAL.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCAL.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCAL.L and MWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer