LCAL.L vs. CI2G.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF - Acc (LCAL.L) and Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (CI2G.L).
LCAL.L and CI2G.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LCAL.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Mar 5, 2018. CI2G.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI India NR USD. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. Both LCAL.L and CI2G.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
LCAL.L vs. CI2G.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LCAL.L vs. CI2G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCAL.L Lyxor MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF - Acc | 4.94% | 24.10% | 13.67% | 0.95% | -11.42% | -4.08% | 24.20% | 14.12% | -7.85% |
CI2G.L Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD | -14.52% | -5.46% | 11.34% | 12.20% | 2.39% | 24.86% | 10.51% | 1.30% | 8.55% |
Different Trading Currencies
LCAL.L is traded in GBP, while CI2G.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CI2G.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCAL.L achieves a 4.94% return, which is significantly higher than CI2G.L's -14.52% return.
LCAL.L
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- -5.97%
- YTD
- 4.94%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- 1Y
- 30.83%
- 3Y*
- 13.61%
- 5Y*
- 4.27%
- 10Y*
- —
CI2G.L
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -9.83%
- YTD
- -14.52%
- 6M
- -11.16%
- 1Y
- -12.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.41%
- 10Y*
- 7.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCAL.L vs. CI2G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCAL.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CI2G.L's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LCAL.L vs. CI2G.L — Risk / Return Rank
LCAL.L
CI2G.L
LCAL.L vs. CI2G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF - Acc (LCAL.L) and Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (CI2G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCAL.L | CI2G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | -0.76 | +2.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.24 | -0.98 | +3.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.88 | +0.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | -0.67 | +3.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.21 | -2.11 | +11.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCAL.L | CI2G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | -0.76 | +2.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.27 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.40 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between LCAL.L and CI2G.L is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LCAL.L vs. CI2G.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LCAL.L nor CI2G.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LCAL.L vs. CI2G.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCAL.L drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, smaller than the maximum CI2G.L drawdown of -37.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCAL.L and CI2G.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCAL.L | CI2G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.83% | -37.13% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -20.32% | +8.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.34% | -27.30% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.58% | -25.27% | +16.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.80% | -7.00% | -5.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 6.43% | -3.05% |
Volatility
LCAL.L vs. CI2G.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF - Acc (LCAL.L) is 7.29%, while Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (CI2G.L) has a volatility of 8.27%. This indicates that LCAL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CI2G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LCAL.L | CI2G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.29% | 8.27% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.11% | 12.27% | +0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.08% | 16.68% | +1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 16.04% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.78% | 19.72% | -0.94% |