LCAL.L vs. IKOR.L
LCAL.L (Lyxor MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF - Acc) and IKOR.L (iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - LCAL.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD while IKOR.L tracks the MSCI Korea NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCAL.L returned 9.38%/yr vs 20.90%/yr for IKOR.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCAL.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IKOR.L.
Performance
LCAL.L vs. IKOR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LCAL.L is traded in GBP, while IKOR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IKOR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCAL.L achieves a 32.38% return, which is significantly lower than IKOR.L's 116.44% return.
LCAL.L
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 12.92%
- YTD
- 32.38%
- 6M
- 35.00%
- 1Y
- 63.67%
- 3Y*
- 23.36%
- 5Y*
- 9.38%
- 10Y*
- —
IKOR.L
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 31.13%
- YTD
- 116.44%
- 6M
- 134.70%
- 1Y
- 259.56%
- 3Y*
- 47.45%
- 5Y*
- 20.90%
- 10Y*
- 18.69%
LCAL.L vs. IKOR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCAL.L Lyxor MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF - Acc | 32.38% | 24.10% | 13.67% | 0.95% | -11.42% | -4.08% | 24.20% | 14.12% | -7.85% |
IKOR.L iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) | 116.44% | 85.96% | -21.55% | 13.31% | -19.76% | -7.30% | 39.09% | 6.99% | -13.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCAL.L and IKOR.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2018 | 0.75 |
The correlation between LCAL.L and IKOR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
LCAL.L vs. IKOR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LCAL.L
IKOR.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Technology
LCAL.L
IKOR.L
Financial Services
LCAL.L
IKOR.L
Consumer Cyclical
LCAL.L
IKOR.L
Industrials
LCAL.L
IKOR.L
Communication Services
LCAL.L
IKOR.L
Healthcare
LCAL.L
IKOR.L
Basic Materials
LCAL.L
IKOR.L
Consumer Defensive
LCAL.L
IKOR.L
Energy
LCAL.L
IKOR.L
Real Estate
LCAL.L
IKOR.L
-
Utilities
LCAL.L
IKOR.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCAL.L vs. IKOR.L — Risk / Return Rank
LCAL.L
IKOR.L
LCAL.L vs. IKOR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF - Acc (LCAL.L) and iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IKOR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCAL.L | IKOR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.90 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.45 | 12.00 | -6.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.54 | 42.78 | -24.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCAL.L | IKOR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.43 | 7.01 | -3.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.83 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.43 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
LCAL.L vs. IKOR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCAL.L drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, smaller than the maximum IKOR.L drawdown of -61.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCAL.L and IKOR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCAL.L | IKOR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.83% | -61.70% | +27.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -21.48% | +9.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.61% | -28.58% | +10.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.34% | -40.83% | +12.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -0.99% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.58% | -15.59% | +3.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 6.04% | -2.62% |
Volatility
LCAL.L vs. IKOR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF - Acc (LCAL.L) is 8.56%, while iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IKOR.L) has a volatility of 17.69%. This indicates that LCAL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IKOR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCAL.L | IKOR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.56% | 17.69% | -9.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.54% | 31.99% | -16.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.47% | 36.80% | -18.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.71% | 25.25% | -7.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.01% | 24.73% | -5.72% |
LCAL.L vs. IKOR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCAL.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IKOR.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCAL.L vs. IKOR.L - Dividend Comparison
LCAL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IKOR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IKOR.L iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) | 0.40% | 0.83% | 1.31% | 1.14% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 0.76% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 0.72% | 0.57% | 0.43% |
LCAL.L Lyxor MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCAL.L and IKOR.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCAL.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCAL.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IKOR.L.
LCAL.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while IKOR.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCAL.L and 0.74% for IKOR.L.
Find the right allocation for LCAL.L and IKOR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer