PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IKOR.L vs. FRXT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

IKOR.L vs. FRXT.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IKOR.L) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF (FRXT.L).

IKOR.L and FRXT.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IKOR.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Korea NR USD. It was launched on Nov 18, 2005. FRXT.L is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the MSCI Taiwan NR USD. It was launched on Mar 21, 2022. Both IKOR.L and FRXT.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IKOR.L vs. FRXT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IKOR.L) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF (FRXT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IKOR.L vs. FRXT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IKOR.L
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)		31.48%83.63%-22.38%11.89%-12.29%
FRXT.L
Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF		14.97%25.34%25.66%22.61%-17.25%
Different Trading Currencies

IKOR.L is traded in GBp, while FRXT.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FRXT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IKOR.L achieves a 31.48% return, which is significantly higher than FRXT.L's 14.97% return.

IKOR.L

1D
8.48%
1M
-11.90%
YTD
31.48%
6M
63.65%
1Y
132.70%
3Y*
26.39%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
11.38%

FRXT.L

1D
3.43%
1M
-4.39%
YTD
14.97%
6M
23.06%
1Y
62.53%
3Y*
26.08%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)

Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF

Often compared with IKOR.L:
IKOR.L vs. VOOIKOR.L vs. FLRK.LIKOR.L vs. EWYIKOR.L vs. AUAD.LIKOR.L vs. PAXJ.LIKOR.L vs. CP9U.LIKOR.L vs. LAUU.L
Often compared with FRXT.L:
FRXT.L vs. VOOFRXT.L vs. XMTW.LFRXT.L vs. JREU.LFRXT.L vs. XDEV.LFRXT.L vs. XDEQ.LFRXT.L vs. FLRK.LFRXT.L vs. KRWL.L

IKOR.L vs. FRXT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IKOR.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FRXT.L's 0.19% expense ratio.

IKOR.L
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)
FRXT.L
Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

IKOR.L vs. FRXT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IKOR.L
IKOR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IKOR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IKOR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IKOR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IKOR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IKOR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
FRXT.L
FRXT.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FRXT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRXT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRXT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FRXT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRXT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IKOR.L vs. FRXT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IKOR.L) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF (FRXT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IKOR.LFRXT.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.22

2.60

+1.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.53

3.18

+1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.47

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.19

5.16

+1.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.68

18.67

+5.01

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IKOR.L vs. FRXT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IKOR.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.22, which is higher than the FRXT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IKOR.L and FRXT.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IKOR.LFRXT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.22

2.60

+1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.81

-0.51

Correlation

The correlation between IKOR.L and FRXT.L is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IKOR.L vs. FRXT.L - Dividend Comparison

IKOR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while FRXT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IKOR.L
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)		0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.00%
FRXT.L
Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IKOR.L vs. FRXT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IKOR.L drawdown since its inception was -61.99%, which is greater than FRXT.L's maximum drawdown of -28.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IKOR.L and FRXT.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

IKOR.LFRXT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.99%

-28.86%

-33.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.71%

-16.68%

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.05%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.08%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.07%

-5.81%

-9.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.71%

-7.19%

-9.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.68%

3.30%

+2.38%

Volatility

IKOR.L vs. FRXT.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IKOR.L) has a higher volatility of 15.85% compared to Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF (FRXT.L) at 7.34%. This indicates that IKOR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRXT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

IKOR.LFRXT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.85%

7.34%

+8.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.31%

15.93%

+11.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.30%

24.01%

+7.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.33%

20.12%

+3.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.77%

20.12%

+3.65%