LBTYK vs. HOG
LBTYK (Liberty Global plc) and HOG (Harley-Davidson, Inc.) are both stocks. LBTYK operates in Entertainment (Communication Services), while HOG operates in Recreational Vehicles (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, LBTYK returned -4.26%/yr vs -4.80%/yr for HOG. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LBTYK vs. HOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LBTYK achieves a -6.16% return, which is significantly lower than HOG's 21.96% return. Over the past 10 years, LBTYK has outperformed HOG with an annualized return of -4.26%, while HOG has yielded a comparatively lower -4.80% annualized return.
LBTYK
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -4.95%
- 6M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -6.16%
- 1Y
- -3.54%
- 3Y*
- 0.27%
- 5Y*
- -5.93%
- 10Y*
- -4.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.71%
HOG
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- 6M
- 26.21%
- YTD
- 21.96%
- 1Y
- 5.36%
- 3Y*
- -11.75%
- 5Y*
- -7.15%
- 10Y*
- -4.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $89.79M | $69.95M | $72.29M | |
LBTYK Liberty Global plc | $16.57M | $12.41M | $13.78M |
LBTYK vs. HOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBTYK Liberty Global plc | -6.16% | -15.98% | 34.64% | -4.07% | -30.83% | 18.77% | 8.49% | 5.62% | -39.01% | 13.94% |
HOG Harley-Davidson, Inc. | 21.96% | -30.05% | -16.61% | -9.76% | 12.13% | 4.29% | 0.19% | 13.62% | -30.54% | -10.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between LBTYK and HOG is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2005 | 0.37 |
The correlation between LBTYK and HOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LBTYK:
$3.53B
HOG:
$2.58B
LBTYK:
-$8.45
HOG:
$1.77
LBTYK:
0.75
HOG:
0.68
LBTYK:
0.38
HOG:
0.85
LBTYK:
$4.88B
HOG:
$4.11B
LBTYK:
$2.80B
HOG:
$982.56M
LBTYK:
-$1.03B
HOG:
$350.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LBTYK vs. HOG — Risk / Return Rank
LBTYK
HOG
LBTYK vs. HOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) and Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LBTYK | HOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.05 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | 0.10 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.13 | 0.18 | -0.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LBTYK vs. HOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LBTYK drawdown since its inception was -78.54%, smaller than the maximum HOG drawdown of -88.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBTYK and HOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LBTYK | HOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.54% | -88.26% | +9.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.31% | -43.24% | +18.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.38% | -58.74% | +22.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.04% | -64.11% | +18.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.81% | -73.28% | +13.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.61% | -55.19% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.64% | -24.53% | -6.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.52% | 23.65% | -14.13% |
Volatility
LBTYK vs. HOG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Liberty Global plc (LBTYK) is 9.41%, while Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG) has a volatility of 11.93%. This indicates that LBTYK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LBTYK | HOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.41% | 11.93% | -2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.45% | 29.91% | -3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.69% | 38.90% | -6.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.94% | 40.42% | -9.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.57% | 42.54% | -10.97% |
Dividends
LBTYK vs. HOG - Dividend Comparison
LBTYK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOG Harley-Davidson, Inc. | 3.00% | 3.51% | 2.29% | 1.79% | 1.51% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 4.03% | 4.34% | 2.87% | 2.40% | 2.73% |
LBTYK Liberty Global plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.57% |
Financials
LBTYK vs. HOG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liberty Global plc and Harley-Davidson, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LBTYK vs. HOG - Profitability Comparison
LBTYK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Liberty Global plc reported a gross profit of 315.30M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.
HOG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Harley-Davidson, Inc. reported a gross profit of 277.18M and revenue of 1.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.
LBTYK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Liberty Global plc reported an operating income of 3.00M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
HOG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Harley-Davidson, Inc. reported an operating income of 45.39M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.1%.
LBTYK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Liberty Global plc reported a net income of -312.20M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of -26.6%.
HOG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Harley-Davidson, Inc. reported a net income of 78.98M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LBTYK and HOG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOG has higher volatility (11.93%) compared to LBTYK (9.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBTYK dropped -78.54% vs HOG's -88.26%.
HOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LBTYK and HOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer