PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LBSAX vs. VALAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LBSAX vs. VALAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) and Al Frank Fund (VALAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBSAX achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly lower than VALAX's 21.52% return. Over the past 10 years, LBSAX has underperformed VALAX with an annualized return of 12.10%, while VALAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.25% annualized return.


LBSAX

1D
-0.57%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
6.98%
6M
8.33%
1Y
19.46%
3Y*
15.93%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
12.10%

VALAX

1D
-0.03%
1M
5.37%
YTD
21.52%
6M
23.95%
1Y
51.82%
3Y*
24.34%
5Y*
11.44%
10Y*
14.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBSAX vs. VALAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LBSAX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A
6.98%15.58%14.73%10.26%-5.19%25.97%7.48%27.84%-4.62%19.96%
VALAX
Al Frank Fund
21.52%23.57%13.35%14.05%-13.50%24.97%10.22%33.98%-7.87%18.09%

Correlation

The correlation between LBSAX and VALAX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006

0.90

The correlation between LBSAX and VALAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LBSAX vs. VALAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBSAX
LBSAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
LBSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LBSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VALAX
VALAX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
VALAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VALAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBSAX vs. VALAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) and Al Frank Fund (VALAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LBSAXVALAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.19

3.85

-1.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.15

5.16

-2.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.68

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

6.06

-2.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.69

24.28

-10.59

LBSAX vs. VALAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBSAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the VALAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBSAX and VALAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LBSAXVALAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

3.85

-1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.65

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.74

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.43

+0.19

Drawdowns

LBSAX vs. VALAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBSAX drawdown since its inception was -47.89%, smaller than the maximum VALAX drawdown of -61.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBSAX and VALAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LBSAXVALAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.89%

-61.26%

+13.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.52%

-8.56%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

-25.81%

+12.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.16%

-25.81%

+8.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.82%

-38.22%

+5.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-0.03%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.26%

-10.75%

+5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

2.14%

-0.67%

Volatility

LBSAX vs. VALAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) is 2.34%, while Al Frank Fund (VALAX) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that LBSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VALAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LBSAXVALAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.34%

4.05%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

10.68%

-3.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.06%

13.65%

-4.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.26%

17.77%

-4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

19.34%

-3.65%

LBSAX vs. VALAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBSAX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than VALAX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

LBSAX vs. VALAX - Dividend Comparison

LBSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, less than VALAX's 7.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LBSAX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A
4.81%5.11%5.78%4.72%3.62%2.65%1.52%2.68%7.36%3.83%3.60%8.01%
VALAX
Al Frank Fund
7.12%8.65%10.32%5.95%8.62%6.83%7.17%13.51%10.73%10.66%5.32%9.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


LBSAX and VALAX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VALAX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to LBSAX (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBSAX dropped -47.89% vs VALAX's -61.26%.

VALAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.85 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LBSAX and VALAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer