PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LBSAX vs. HLIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LBSAX vs. HLIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) and JPMorgan Equity Income Fund (HLIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBSAX achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly lower than HLIEX's 12.91% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LBSAX having a 12.31% annualized return and HLIEX not far ahead at 12.60%.


LBSAX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.36%
YTD
8.70%
6M
8.08%
1Y
20.09%
3Y*
15.58%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
12.31%

HLIEX

1D
0.62%
1M
3.35%
YTD
12.91%
6M
12.12%
1Y
24.43%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
11.64%
10Y*
12.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBSAX vs. HLIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LBSAX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A
8.70%15.58%14.73%10.26%-5.19%25.97%7.48%27.84%-4.62%19.96%
HLIEX
JPMorgan Equity Income Fund
12.91%14.67%19.67%4.79%-1.88%25.10%3.61%26.30%-4.45%17.55%

Correlation

The correlation between LBSAX and HLIEX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2002

0.97

The correlation between LBSAX and HLIEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LBSAX vs. HLIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBSAX
LBSAX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LBSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
LBSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

HLIEX
HLIEX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HLIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
HLIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBSAX vs. HLIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) and JPMorgan Equity Income Fund (HLIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LBSAXHLIEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.43

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

3.59

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.45

13.70

+0.75

LBSAX vs. HLIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBSAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the HLIEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBSAX and HLIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LBSAX vs. HLIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBSAX drawdown since its inception was -47.89%, roughly equal to the maximum HLIEX drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBSAX and HLIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LBSAXHLIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.89%

-50.33%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.52%

-7.08%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

-14.19%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.16%

-14.85%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.82%

-36.89%

+4.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-0.11%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-6.36%

+1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

1.85%

-0.38%

Volatility

LBSAX vs. HLIEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) is 2.65%, while JPMorgan Equity Income Fund (HLIEX) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that LBSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LBSAXHLIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

3.31%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.90%

8.05%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.19%

10.61%

-1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.26%

14.30%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.70%

16.81%

-1.11%

LBSAX vs. HLIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBSAX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than HLIEX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

LBSAX vs. HLIEX - Dividend Comparison

LBSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than HLIEX's 9.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLIEX
JPMorgan Equity Income Fund
9.58%10.81%14.41%2.77%3.67%3.33%1.82%2.78%5.12%2.47%2.45%2.73%
LBSAX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A
4.72%5.11%5.78%4.72%3.62%2.65%1.52%2.68%7.36%3.83%3.60%8.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, LBSAX and HLIEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HLIEX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to LBSAX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBSAX dropped -47.89% vs HLIEX's -50.33%.

HLIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LBSAX and HLIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer