LBSAX vs. CMTFX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LBSAX (Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A) and CMTFX (Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - LBSAX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Columbia, while CMTFX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, LBSAX returned 12.31%/yr vs 25.48%/yr for CMTFX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LBSAX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for CMTFX.

Performance

LBSAX vs. CMTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBSAX achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly lower than CMTFX's 31.20% return. Over the past 10 years, LBSAX has underperformed CMTFX with an annualized return of 12.31%, while CMTFX has yielded a comparatively higher 25.48% annualized return.

LBSAX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 8.70%
• 6M: 8.08%
• 1Y: 20.09%
• 3Y*: 15.58%
• 5Y*: 11.24%
• 10Y*: 12.31%

CMTFX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 7.93%
• YTD: 31.20%
• 6M: 30.04%
• 1Y: 57.93%
• 3Y*: 35.50%
• 5Y*: 19.79%
• 10Y*: 25.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBSAX vs. CMTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LBSAX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A	8.70%	15.58%	14.73%	10.26%	-5.19%	25.97%	7.48%	27.84%	-4.62%	19.96%
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund	31.20%	25.10%	31.72%	56.85%	-34.63%	23.04%	49.65%	44.21%	-1.26%	43.38%

Correlation

The correlation between LBSAX and CMTFX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2002	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between LBSAX and CMTFX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LBSAX vs. CMTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBSAX

LBSAX Risk / Return Rank: 77
LBSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
LBSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
LBSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
LBSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
LBSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

CMTFX

CMTFX Risk / Return Rank: 79
CMTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
CMTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
CMTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
CMTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CMTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBSAX vs. CMTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LBSAX	CMTFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	2.55	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	3.11	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.42	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.84	4.16	-0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.45	14.84	-0.39

LBSAX vs. CMTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBSAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the CMTFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBSAX and CMTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LBSAX vs. CMTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBSAX drawdown since its inception was -47.89%, smaller than the maximum CMTFX drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBSAX and CMTFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LBSAX	CMTFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.89%	-68.28%	+20.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.52%	-14.35%	+8.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.03%	-26.63%	+13.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.16%	-39.42%	+22.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.82%	-39.42%	+6.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.03%	-0.75%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.24%	-16.27%	+11.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.47%	4.02%	-2.55%

Volatility

LBSAX vs. CMTFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) is 2.65%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) has a volatility of 11.62%. This indicates that LBSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LBSAX	CMTFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.65%	11.62%	-8.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.90%	19.35%	-12.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.19%	23.46%	-14.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.26%	26.38%	-13.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.70%	25.06%	-9.36%

LBSAX vs. CMTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBSAX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than CMTFX's 0.92% expense ratio.

Dividends

LBSAX vs. CMTFX - Dividend Comparison

LBSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than CMTFX's 2.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund	2.36%	3.09%	1.02%	2.23%	3.36%	4.19%	0.87%	2.44%	5.89%	3.60%	0.35%	1.74%
LBSAX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A	4.72%	5.11%	5.78%	4.72%	3.62%	2.65%	1.52%	2.68%	7.36%	3.83%	3.60%	8.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LBSAX and CMTFX in my portfolio?

LBSAX and CMTFX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LBSAX or CMTFX?

CMTFX has higher volatility (11.62%) compared to LBSAX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBSAX dropped -47.89% vs CMTFX's -68.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.