LBS.TO vs. SPLT.TO
LBS.TO (Life & Banc Split Corp.) is a stock, while SPLT.TO (Brompton Split Corp. Preferred Share ETF) is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Brompton Funds. Over the past year, LBS.TO returned 92.15% vs 5.81% for SPLT.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LBS.TO vs. SPLT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LBS.TO achieves a 26.19% return, which is significantly higher than SPLT.TO's 2.84% return.
LBS.TO
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 7.18%
- YTD
- 26.19%
- 6M
- 36.71%
- 1Y
- 92.15%
- 3Y*
- 41.03%
- 5Y*
- 25.90%
- 10Y*
- 21.53%
SPLT.TO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- YTD
- 2.84%
- 6M
- 3.64%
- 1Y
- 5.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LBS.TO vs. SPLT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LBS.TO Life & Banc Split Corp. | 26.19% | 64.98% | 32.81% | 0.40% |
SPLT.TO Brompton Split Corp. Preferred Share ETF | 2.84% | 5.80% | 14.11% | 5.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between LBS.TO and SPLT.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023 | 0.21 |
The correlation between LBS.TO and SPLT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LBS.TO vs. SPLT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
LBS.TO
SPLT.TO
LBS.TO vs. SPLT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) and Brompton Split Corp. Preferred Share ETF (SPLT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LBS.TO | SPLT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.80 | 1.34 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.46 | 3.21 | +3.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.39 | 8.60 | +21.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LBS.TO | SPLT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.52 | 1.74 | +2.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 2.05 | -1.72 |
Drawdowns
LBS.TO vs. SPLT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LBS.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.80%, which is greater than SPLT.TO's maximum drawdown of -5.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBS.TO and SPLT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LBS.TO | SPLT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.80% | -5.36% | -78.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.34% | -1.82% | -12.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -0.14% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.80% | -0.51% | -13.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 0.68% | +2.36% |
Volatility
LBS.TO vs. SPLT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Brompton Split Corp. Preferred Share ETF (SPLT.TO) at 0.74%. This indicates that LBS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPLT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LBS.TO | SPLT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 0.74% | +3.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.44% | 2.25% | +15.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.48% | 3.36% | +17.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 4.67% | +19.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.13% | 4.67% | +32.46% |
Dividends
LBS.TO vs. SPLT.TO - Dividend Comparison
LBS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.24%, more than SPLT.TO's 5.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBS.TO Life & Banc Split Corp. | 8.24% | 9.34% | 13.29% | 15.23% | 13.89% | 11.89% | 5.56% | 15.06% | 17.96% | 12.05% | 12.35% | 14.91% |
SPLT.TO Brompton Split Corp. Preferred Share ETF | 5.99% | 6.01% | 5.99% | 3.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LBS.TO and SPLT.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LBS.TO and SPLT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer