PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LBS.TO vs. CSH2.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LBS.TO vs. CSH2.L

Last updated Jun 30, 2026
See Documentation

LBS.TO (Life & Banc Split Corp.) is a stock, while CSH2.L (Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc) is Money Market fund tracking the SONIA Compounded (GBP Hedged). Over the past 10 years, LBS.TO returned 30.61%/yr vs 3.03%/yr for CSH2.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LBS.TO vs. CSH2.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) and Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LBS.TO is traded in CAD, while CSH2.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSH2.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBS.TO achieves a 92.41% return, which is significantly higher than CSH2.L's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, LBS.TO has outperformed CSH2.L with an annualized return of 30.61%, while CSH2.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.03% annualized return.

LBS.TO

1D
-0.45%
1M
32.16%
YTD
92.41%
6M
90.38%
1Y
162.44%
3Y*
60.88%
5Y*
39.30%
10Y*
30.61%

CSH2.L

1D
0.38%
1M
1.74%
YTD
4.05%
6M
3.91%
1Y
4.86%
3Y*
8.93%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
3.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBS.TO vs. CSH2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LBS.TO
Life & Banc Split Corp.		92.41%55.41%38.56%10.41%0.97%65.80%-3.16%44.97%-20.15%19.78%
CSH2.L
Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc		4.05%7.43%12.65%7.62%-3.57%-0.83%0.92%0.54%2.99%2.54%

Correlation

The correlation between LBS.TO and CSH2.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Life & Banc Split Corp.

Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc

Often compared with LBS.TO:
LBS.TO vs. BK.TOLBS.TO vs. SBC.TOLBS.TO vs. DFN.TOLBS.TO vs. FTN.TOLBS.TO vs. LCS.TOLBS.TO vs. VDY.TOLBS.TO vs. BCE.TO
Often compared with CSH2.L:
CSH2.L vs. ERNS.LCSH2.L vs. MINV.LCSH2.L vs. BILSCSH2.L vs. TI5G.LCSH2.L vs. ERNA.LCSH2.L vs. LCSIXCSH2.L vs. AAPL

Return for Risk

LBS.TO vs. CSH2.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LBS.TO
LBS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LBS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
CSH2.L
CSH2.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBS.TO vs. CSH2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) and Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

LBS.TOCSH2.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.62
0.63

+3.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.07
0.97

+3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.87

1.11

+0.76

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.43

1.05

+5.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.45

2.93

+25.52

LBS.TO vs. CSH2.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.62, which is higher than the CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBS.TO and CSH2.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LBS.TO vs. CSH2.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBS.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.14%, which is greater than CSH2.L's maximum drawdown of -27.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBS.TO and CSH2.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LBS.TOCSH2.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.14%

-27.53%

-55.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.43%

-4.62%

-20.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.23%

-4.84%

-29.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.44%

-16.79%

-18.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.25%

-19.45%

-43.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

0.00%

-1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.78%

-12.30%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.73%

1.60%

+4.13%

Volatility

LBS.TO vs. CSH2.L - Volatility Comparison

Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.99% compared to Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L) at 1.83%. This indicates that LBS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LBS.TOCSH2.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.99%

1.83%

+11.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.15%

5.86%

+36.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.20%

7.72%

+37.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.58%

10.31%

+20.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.24%

10.68%

+28.56%

Dividends

LBS.TO vs. CSH2.L - Dividend Comparison

LBS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.21%, while CSH2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSH2.L
Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LBS.TO
Life & Banc Split Corp.		7.21%12.92%17.12%19.61%17.88%15.33%7.16%19.39%23.12%15.52%15.92%19.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

LBS.TO and CSH2.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LBS.TO and CSH2.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer