PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LBS.TO vs. BX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LBS.TO vs. BX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) and Blackstone Inc. (BX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LBS.TO is traded in CAD, while BX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBS.TO achieves a 92.41% return, which is significantly higher than BX's -21.15% return. Over the past 10 years, LBS.TO has outperformed BX with an annualized return of 30.61%, while BX has yielded a comparatively lower 23.16% annualized return.


LBS.TO

1D
-0.45%
1M
32.16%
YTD
92.41%
6M
90.38%
1Y
162.44%
3Y*
60.88%
5Y*
39.30%
10Y*
30.61%

BX

1D
-0.53%
1M
1.11%
YTD
-21.15%
6M
-21.51%
1Y
-18.06%
3Y*
13.24%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
23.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBS.TO vs. BX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LBS.TO
Life & Banc Split Corp.
92.41%55.41%38.56%10.41%0.97%65.80%-3.16%44.97%-20.15%19.78%
BX
Blackstone Inc.
-21.15%-12.05%46.51%78.40%-36.20%107.00%16.93%88.23%8.52%18.72%

Correlation

The correlation between LBS.TO and BX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2007

0.35

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LBS.TO:

CA$682.46M

BX:

$90.02B

EPS

LBS.TO:

CA$8.45

BX:

$3.90

PE Ratio

LBS.TO:

1.57

BX:

29.43

PEG Ratio

LBS.TO:

0.04

BX:

10.82

PS Ratio

LBS.TO:

4.03

BX:

6.00

PB Ratio

LBS.TO:

1.01

BX:

10.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

LBS.TO:

CA$169.21M

BX:

$14.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LBS.TO:

CA$160.11M

BX:

$13.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

LBS.TO:

CA$425.46M

BX:

$7.37B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LBS.TO vs. BX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBS.TO
LBS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LBS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

BX
BX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBS.TO vs. BX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) and Blackstone Inc. (BX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LBS.TOBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.87

0.94

+0.94

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.43

-0.40

+6.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.45

-0.72

+29.17

LBS.TO vs. BX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.62, which is higher than the BX Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBS.TO and BX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LBS.TO vs. BX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBS.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.14%, roughly equal to the maximum BX drawdown of -86.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBS.TO and BX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LBS.TOBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.14%

-86.02%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.43%

-45.44%

+20.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.23%

-47.94%

+13.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.44%

-47.94%

+12.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.25%

-47.94%

-15.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-38.34%

+37.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.78%

-25.88%

+14.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.73%

24.95%

-19.22%

Volatility

LBS.TO vs. BX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) is 12.99%, while Blackstone Inc. (BX) has a volatility of 13.68%. This indicates that LBS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LBS.TOBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.99%

13.68%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.15%

29.15%

+13.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.20%

35.25%

+9.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.58%

39.84%

-9.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.24%

36.25%

+2.99%

Dividends

LBS.TO vs. BX - Dividend Comparison

LBS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.21%, more than BX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BX
Blackstone Inc.
4.33%3.04%2.00%2.54%6.66%2.76%2.95%3.43%8.12%7.25%6.14%11.76%
LBS.TO
Life & Banc Split Corp.
7.21%12.92%17.12%19.61%17.88%15.33%7.16%19.39%23.12%15.52%15.92%19.20%

Financials

LBS.TO vs. BX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Life & Banc Split Corp. and Blackstone Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
41.60M
4.10B
(LBS.TO) Total Revenue
(BX) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. LBS.TO values in CAD, BX values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


LBS.TO and BX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LBS.TO and BX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer