LBO vs. TYLD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LBO (WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF) and TYLD (Cambria Tactical Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LBO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by White Wolf, while TYLD is a fund fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LBO returned -12.59% vs 3.96% for TYLD. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. LBO charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TYLD.

Performance

LBO vs. TYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) and Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBO achieves a -13.89% return, which is significantly lower than TYLD's 1.68% return.

LBO

• 1D: -1.51%
• 1M: -2.40%
• YTD: -13.89%
• 6M: -14.29%
• 1Y: -12.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TYLD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.68%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBO vs. TYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LBO WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF	-13.89%	-6.41%	32.90%
TYLD Cambria Tactical Yield ETF	1.68%	4.05%	5.09%

Correlation

The correlation between LBO and TYLD is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2024	-0.05

Return for Risk

LBO vs. TYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBO

LBO Risk / Return Rank: 5
LBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
LBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
LBO Omega Ratio Rank: 4
LBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
LBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

TYLD

TYLD Risk / Return Rank: 99
TYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
TYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
TYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
TYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
TYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBO vs. TYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) and Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LBO	TYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.57	5.41	-5.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.68	11.03	-11.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	2.59	-1.67
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.43	33.51	-33.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.84	124.34	-125.19

LBO vs. TYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBO Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the TYLD Sharpe Ratio of 5.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBO and TYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LBO vs. TYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBO drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, which is greater than TYLD's maximum drawdown of -1.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBO and TYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	LBO	TYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.40%	-1.06%	-30.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.19%	-0.12%	-29.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.30%	0.00%	-24.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.61%	-0.10%	-8.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.93%	0.03%	+14.90%

Volatility

LBO vs. TYLD - Volatility Comparison

WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD) at 0.15%. This indicates that LBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LBO	TYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.64%	0.15%	+6.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.46%	0.54%	+17.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.04%	0.74%	+21.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.23%	1.75%	+19.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.23%	1.75%	+19.48%

LBO vs. TYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBO has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

LBO vs. TYLD - Dividend Comparison

LBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.91%, more than TYLD's 3.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LBO WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF	7.91%	7.04%	5.79%	1.20%
TYLD Cambria Tactical Yield ETF	3.74%	4.38%	4.24%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LBO and TYLD in my portfolio?

LBO and TYLD have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LBO or TYLD?

LBO has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to TYLD (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBO dropped -31.40% vs TYLD's -1.06%.

Which ETF is better, LBO or TYLD?

On 1-year performance, TYLD leads with 3.96% vs -12.59% for LBO. On fees, TYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LBO or TYLD?

Over the 1-year period, TYLD has performed better with a 3.96% return vs -12.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LBO or TYLD?

TYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LBO or TYLD?

LBO has the higher dividend yield at 7.91%, compared with 3.74% for TYLD.

What is the main difference between LBO and TYLD?

They also come from different issuers: White Wolf and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LBO and 0.59% for TYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.41 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.