LBO vs. MOOD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

LBO (WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF) and MOOD (Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LBO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while MOOD is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LBO returned -14.55% vs 32.12% for MOOD. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LBO charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for MOOD.

Performance

LBO vs. MOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBO achieves a -10.41% return, which is significantly lower than MOOD's 13.27% return.

LBO

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: 3.40%
• 6M: -7.82%
• YTD: -10.41%
• 1Y: -14.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.37%

MOOD

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.12%
• 6M: 5.83%
• YTD: 13.27%
• 1Y: 32.12%
• 3Y*: 19.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LBO WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF	$3.76K	$7.07K	$41.04K
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	$594.91K	$566.29K	$735.34K

LBO vs. MOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LBO WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF	-10.41%	-6.41%	30.93%	7.39%
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	13.27%	30.39%	12.53%	2.25%

Correlation

The correlation between LBO and MOOD is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023	0.50

The correlation between LBO and MOOD shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LBO vs. MOOD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LBO	MOOD
Financial Services	96.1%	12.4%
Industrials	3.9%	9.9%
Basic Materials	-	5.9%
Communication Services	-	8.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.4%
Energy	-	3.0%
Healthcare	-	9.0%
Real Estate	-	2.1%
Technology	-	33.5%
Utilities	-	2.2%

Return for Risk

LBO vs. MOOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LBO

LBO Risk / Return Rank: 4
LBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
LBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
LBO Omega Ratio Rank: 4
LBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
LBO Martin Ratio Rank: 4

MOOD

MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 84
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 90
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LBO vs. MOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LBO	MOOD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.72	2.14	-2.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.90	2.57	-3.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.42	-0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.59	3.23	-3.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.10	9.79	-10.89

LBO vs. MOOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBO Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the MOOD Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBO and MOOD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LBO vs. MOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBO drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, which is greater than MOOD's maximum drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBO and MOOD.

Drawdown Indicators

	LBO	MOOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.40%	-14.34%	-17.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.32%	-9.71%	-17.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.24%	-2.08%	-19.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.21%	-2.30%	-6.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.51%	3.20%	+11.31%

Volatility

LBO vs. MOOD - Volatility Comparison

WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) at 2.45%. This indicates that LBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LBO	MOOD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.58%	2.45%	+3.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.33%	12.23%	+6.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.30%	14.69%	+7.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.15%	12.09%	+9.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.15%	12.09%	+9.06%

LBO vs. MOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBO has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than MOOD's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

LBO vs. MOOD - Dividend Comparison

LBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, more than MOOD's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
LBO WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF	6.64%	7.04%	5.79%	1.20%	0.00%
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	0.36%	0.40%	1.33%	1.34%	1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LBO and MOOD in my portfolio?

LBO and MOOD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LBO or MOOD?

LBO has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to MOOD (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBO dropped -31.40% vs MOOD's -14.34%.

Which ETF is better, LBO or MOOD?

On 1-year performance, MOOD leads with 32.12% vs -14.55% for LBO. On fees, LBO is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, MOOD has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LBO or MOOD?

Over the 1-year period, MOOD has performed better with a 32.12% return vs -14.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LBO or MOOD?

LBO is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for MOOD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LBO or MOOD?

LBO has the higher dividend yield at 6.64%, compared with 0.36% for MOOD.

What is the main difference between LBO and MOOD?

LBO is categorized as Financials Equities, while MOOD is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LBO and 0.73% for MOOD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MOOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.