LBO vs. BWET

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

LBO (WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LBO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by White Wolf, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. LBO is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. Over the past year, LBO returned -16.42% vs 1898.00% for BWET. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. LBO charges 0.70%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

LBO vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBO achieves a -9.50% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 1,090.11% return.

LBO

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 0.14%
• 6M: -13.08%
• YTD: -9.50%
• 1Y: -16.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 17.22%
• 6M: 619.17%
• YTD: 1,090.11%
• 1Y: 1,898.00%
• 3Y*: 125.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBO vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LBO WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF	-9.50%	-6.41%	30.93%	7.39%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	1,090.11%	96.22%	-39.21%	-8.45%

Correlation

The correlation between LBO and BWET is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023	-0.05

Return for Risk

LBO vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBO

LBO Risk / Return Rank: 4
LBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
LBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
LBO Omega Ratio Rank: 4
LBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
LBO Martin Ratio Rank: 4

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 99
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBO vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LBO	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.75	17.89	-18.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.94	6.15	-7.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.89	-1.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.56	46.63	-47.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.04	176.08	-177.12

LBO vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBO Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 17.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBO and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LBO vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBO drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBO and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	LBO	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.40%	-56.90%	+25.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.19%	-41.22%	+12.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.44%	-10.91%	-9.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.99%	-23.65%	+14.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.89%	10.89%	+5.00%

Volatility

LBO vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) is 5.57%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 48.58%. This indicates that LBO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LBO	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.57%	48.58%	-43.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.36%	96.67%	-78.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.22%	107.50%	-85.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.16%	74.64%	-53.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.16%	74.64%	-53.48%

LBO vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBO has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

LBO vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

LBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LBO WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF	6.57%	7.04%	5.79%	1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LBO and BWET in my portfolio?

LBO and BWET have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LBO or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (48.58%) compared to LBO (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBO dropped -31.40% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, LBO or BWET?

On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 1898.00% vs -16.42% for LBO. On fees, LBO is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, LBO has been the lower-risk option at 5.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LBO or BWET?

Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 1898.00% return vs -16.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LBO or BWET?

LBO is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LBO or BWET?

LBO has the higher dividend yield at 6.57%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between LBO and BWET?

LBO is categorized as Financials Equities, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: White Wolf and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LBO and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.89 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.