LBO vs. AGZD

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

LBO (WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF) and AGZD (WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - LBO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by White Wolf, while AGZD is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Zero Duration. LBO is actively managed, while AGZD is passively managed. Over the past year, LBO returned -18.83% vs 5.39% for AGZD. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LBO charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for AGZD.

Performance

LBO vs. AGZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBO achieves a -10.60% return, which is significantly lower than AGZD's 2.51% return.

LBO

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: 0.97%
• 6M: -14.13%
• YTD: -10.60%
• 1Y: -18.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AGZD

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.27%
• 6M: 2.15%
• YTD: 2.51%
• 1Y: 5.39%
• 3Y*: 5.69%
• 5Y*: 4.38%
• 10Y*: 3.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBO vs. AGZD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LBO WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF	-10.60%	-6.41%	30.93%	7.39%
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund	2.51%	4.35%	6.64%	1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between LBO and AGZD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023	0.06

Return for Risk

LBO vs. AGZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBO

LBO Risk / Return Rank: 3
LBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
LBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
LBO Omega Ratio Rank: 3
LBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
LBO Martin Ratio Rank: 4

AGZD

AGZD Risk / Return Rank: 87
AGZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
AGZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
AGZD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
AGZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AGZD Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBO vs. AGZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LBO	AGZD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.86	2.02	-2.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.11	2.94	-4.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.39	-0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.65	7.40	-8.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.18	21.32	-22.51

LBO vs. AGZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBO Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the AGZD Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBO and AGZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LBO vs. AGZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBO drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, which is greater than AGZD's maximum drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBO and AGZD.

Drawdown Indicators

	LBO	AGZD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.40%	-8.46%	-22.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.19%	-0.73%	-28.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-2.23%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-8.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.41%	-0.34%	-21.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.00%	-0.77%	-8.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.93%	0.25%	+15.68%

Volatility

LBO vs. AGZD - Volatility Comparison

WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD) at 0.70%. This indicates that LBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LBO	AGZD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.64%	0.70%	+4.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.33%	1.94%	+16.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.13%	2.68%	+19.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.16%	3.60%	+17.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.16%	3.69%	+17.47%

LBO vs. AGZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBO has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than AGZD's 0.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

LBO vs. AGZD - Dividend Comparison

LBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, more than AGZD's 3.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund	3.99%	4.12%	3.96%	6.07%	8.61%	1.66%	2.28%	2.83%	2.62%	2.31%	1.81%	1.66%
LBO WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF	6.65%	7.04%	5.79%	1.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LBO and AGZD in my portfolio?

LBO and AGZD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LBO or AGZD?

LBO has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to AGZD (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBO dropped -31.40% vs AGZD's -8.46%.

Which ETF is better, LBO or AGZD?

On 1-year performance, AGZD leads with 5.39% vs -18.83% for LBO. On fees, AGZD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, AGZD has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LBO or AGZD?

Over the 1-year period, AGZD has performed better with a 5.39% return vs -18.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LBO or AGZD?

AGZD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LBO or AGZD?

LBO has the higher dividend yield at 6.65%, compared with 3.99% for AGZD.

What is the main difference between LBO and AGZD?

LBO is categorized as Financials Equities, while AGZD is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: White Wolf and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LBO and 0.23% for AGZD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AGZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.