LBNK.DE vs. IMEA.SW
LBNK.DE (Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc) and IMEA.SW (iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - LBNK.DE is a Financials Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Banks, while IMEA.SW is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LBNK.DE returned 14.15%/yr vs 9.09%/yr for IMEA.SW. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LBNK.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for IMEA.SW.
Performance
LBNK.DE vs. IMEA.SW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LBNK.DE is traded in EUR, while IMEA.SW is traded in CHF. To make them comparable, the IMEA.SW values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LBNK.DE achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly higher than IMEA.SW's 6.92% return. Over the past 10 years, LBNK.DE has outperformed IMEA.SW with an annualized return of 14.15%, while IMEA.SW has yielded a comparatively lower 9.09% annualized return.
LBNK.DE
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 6M
- 15.54%
- 1Y
- 40.00%
- 3Y*
- 42.34%
- 5Y*
- 27.76%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
IMEA.SW
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 6.92%
- 6M
- 9.58%
- 1Y
- 16.24%
- 3Y*
- 13.57%
- 5Y*
- 9.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
LBNK.DE vs. IMEA.SW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBNK.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc | 7.56% | 76.66% | 32.67% | 26.48% | 1.30% | 37.71% | -24.17% | 14.90% | -25.93% | 11.91% |
IMEA.SW iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 6.92% | 20.83% | 8.07% | 15.98% | -9.59% | 25.21% | -2.68% | 28.78% | -12.10% | 11.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between LBNK.DE and IMEA.SW is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, LBNK.DE and IMEA.SW have become more correlated (0.68) than their long-term average of 0.38, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LBNK.DE vs. IMEA.SW — Risk / Return Rank
LBNK.DE
IMEA.SW
LBNK.DE vs. IMEA.SW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMEA.SW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LBNK.DE | IMEA.SW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.24 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 1.70 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.86 | 6.32 | +2.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LBNK.DE | IMEA.SW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 1.28 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.20 | 0.64 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.56 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.51 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
LBNK.DE vs. IMEA.SW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LBNK.DE drawdown since its inception was -81.84%, which is greater than IMEA.SW's maximum drawdown of -35.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBNK.DE and IMEA.SW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LBNK.DE | IMEA.SW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.84% | -35.63% | -46.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.83% | -9.49% | -6.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.26% | -17.56% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.82% | -20.05% | -7.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.08% | -35.63% | -20.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -0.65% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.20% | -5.36% | -47.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 2.53% | +2.12% |
Volatility
LBNK.DE vs. IMEA.SW - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMEA.SW) at 3.96%. This indicates that LBNK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMEA.SW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LBNK.DE | IMEA.SW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.68% | 3.96% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.02% | 10.47% | +7.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.10% | 12.58% | +9.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 15.50% | +7.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.34% | 16.43% | +8.91% |
LBNK.DE vs. IMEA.SW - Expense Ratio Comparison
LBNK.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IMEA.SW's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
LBNK.DE vs. IMEA.SW - Dividend Comparison
Neither LBNK.DE nor IMEA.SW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LBNK.DE and IMEA.SW have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IMEA.SW is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IMEA.SW is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LBNK.DE.
LBNK.DE is categorized as Financials Equities, while IMEA.SW is Europe Equities. LBNK.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Banks, while IMEA.SW tracks MSCI Europe Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LBNK.DE and 0.12% for IMEA.SW.
Find the right allocation for LBNK.DE and IMEA.SW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer