PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMEA.SW vs. SX5E.SW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMEA.SW vs. SX5E.SW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CHF 10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMEA.SW) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF Acc (SX5E.SW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IMEA.SW is traded in CHF, while SX5E.SW is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SX5E.SW values have been converted to CHF using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IMEA.SW having a 5.25% return and SX5E.SW slightly lower at 5.18%. Over the past 10 years, IMEA.SW has underperformed SX5E.SW with an annualized return of 7.09%, while SX5E.SW has yielded a comparatively higher 8.15% annualized return.


IMEA.SW

1D
-0.31%
1M
4.08%
YTD
5.25%
6M
7.98%
1Y
13.82%
3Y*
11.14%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*
7.09%

SX5E.SW

1D
1.20%
1M
4.62%
YTD
5.18%
6M
7.25%
1Y
13.59%
3Y*
13.44%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
8.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMEA.SW vs. SX5E.SW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMEA.SW
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
5.25%19.46%9.47%8.86%-13.54%19.51%-2.82%24.06%-15.32%21.31%
SX5E.SW
Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF Acc
5.18%21.04%12.36%14.59%-12.82%17.63%-2.58%24.41%-16.76%22.75%

Correlation

The correlation between IMEA.SW and SX5E.SW is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2015

0.52

Over the past year, IMEA.SW and SX5E.SW have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.52, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMEA.SW vs. SX5E.SW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMEA.SW
IMEA.SW Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
IMEA.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMEA.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMEA.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
IMEA.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMEA.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

SX5E.SW
SX5E.SW Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SX5E.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SX5E.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SX5E.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SX5E.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SX5E.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMEA.SW vs. SX5E.SW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMEA.SW) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF Acc (SX5E.SW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMEA.SWSX5E.SWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

0.93

+0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

1.38

+0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.18

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

1.37

+0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.43

4.48

+0.95

IMEA.SW vs. SX5E.SW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMEA.SW Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the SX5E.SW Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMEA.SW and SX5E.SW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMEA.SWSX5E.SWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

0.93

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.47

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.50

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.49

-0.11

Drawdowns

IMEA.SW vs. SX5E.SW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMEA.SW drawdown since its inception was -36.01%, smaller than the maximum SX5E.SW drawdown of -39.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMEA.SW and SX5E.SW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMEA.SWSX5E.SWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.01%

-39.76%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-10.85%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.71%

-17.54%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.25%

-30.70%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

-39.76%

+3.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

0.00%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-7.51%

+1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

3.31%

-0.74%

Volatility

IMEA.SW vs. SX5E.SW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMEA.SW) is 3.94%, while Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF Acc (SX5E.SW) has a volatility of 4.38%. This indicates that IMEA.SW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SX5E.SW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMEA.SWSX5E.SWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

4.38%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.16%

12.78%

-2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

16.08%

-3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

19.89%

-3.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.85%

21.77%

-4.92%

IMEA.SW vs. SX5E.SW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMEA.SW has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SX5E.SW's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMEA.SW vs. SX5E.SW - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMEA.SW nor SX5E.SW has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IMEA.SW and SX5E.SW have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SX5E.SW is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SX5E.SW is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for IMEA.SW.

IMEA.SW tracks MSCI Europe Index, while SX5E.SW tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IMEA.SW and 0.05% for SX5E.SW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMEA.SW and SX5E.SW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer