PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LBNK.DE vs. 4GLD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LBNK.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBNK.DE achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly higher than 4GLD.DE's 2.80% return. Over the past 10 years, LBNK.DE has outperformed 4GLD.DE with an annualized return of 14.15%, while 4GLD.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 13.36% annualized return.


LBNK.DE

1D
0.67%
1M
2.51%
YTD
7.56%
6M
15.54%
1Y
40.00%
3Y*
42.34%
5Y*
27.76%
10Y*
14.15%

4GLD.DE

1D
0.57%
1M
-3.60%
YTD
2.80%
6M
6.23%
1Y
31.21%
3Y*
28.18%
5Y*
19.85%
10Y*
13.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBNK.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LBNK.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc
7.56%76.66%32.67%26.48%1.30%37.71%-24.17%14.90%-25.93%11.91%
4GLD.DE
Xetra-Gold
2.80%49.32%34.57%9.32%7.12%4.03%13.05%21.25%3.20%-1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between LBNK.DE and 4GLD.DE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2008

-0.09

The correlation between LBNK.DE and 4GLD.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (10 years) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LBNK.DE vs. 4GLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBNK.DE
LBNK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LBNK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBNK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBNK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LBNK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBNK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

4GLD.DE
4GLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBNK.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LBNK.DE4GLD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.26

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

1.82

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

4.63

+4.24

LBNK.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBNK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the 4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBNK.DE and 4GLD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LBNK.DE4GLD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

1.31

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.20

1.23

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.92

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.65

-0.59

Drawdowns

LBNK.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBNK.DE drawdown since its inception was -81.84%, which is greater than 4GLD.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBNK.DE and 4GLD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LBNK.DE4GLD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.84%

-36.79%

-45.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.83%

-16.54%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.26%

-16.54%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.82%

-16.54%

-11.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.08%

-18.23%

-37.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-14.95%

+13.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.20%

-11.83%

-41.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

6.52%

-1.87%

Volatility

LBNK.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) at 5.09%. This indicates that LBNK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4GLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LBNK.DE4GLD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

5.09%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.02%

20.09%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.10%

23.06%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.90%

16.00%

+6.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.34%

14.37%

+10.97%

LBNK.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBNK.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than 4GLD.DE's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

LBNK.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LBNK.DE nor 4GLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LBNK.DE and 4GLD.DE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LBNK.DE.

LBNK.DE is categorized as Financials Equities, while 4GLD.DE is Gold. LBNK.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Banks, while 4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Deutsche Börse Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LBNK.DE and 0.00% for 4GLD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LBNK.DE and 4GLD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer