PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LBFFX vs. PTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LBFFX vs. PTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX) and Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund (PTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LBFFX vs. PTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LBFFX
Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F
4.02%22.11%13.82%7.16%-23.30%1.26%19.03%
PTA
Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund
0.35%9.04%15.82%11.58%-20.50%-0.95%4.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBFFX achieves a 4.02% return, which is significantly higher than PTA's 0.35% return.


LBFFX

1D
2.26%
1M
-4.19%
YTD
4.02%
6M
6.17%
1Y
28.37%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*
11.86%

PTA

1D
1.28%
1M
-3.42%
YTD
0.35%
6M
-4.62%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
11.03%
5Y*
2.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LBFFX vs. PTA - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

LBFFX vs. PTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBFFX
LBFFX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LBFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
LBFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PTA
PTA Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
PTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTA Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
PTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTA Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBFFX vs. PTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX) and Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund (PTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LBFFXPTADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.00

0.37

+1.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

0.60

+2.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.09

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.05

0.59

+3.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.35

1.57

+12.78

LBFFX vs. PTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBFFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the PTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBFFX and PTA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LBFFXPTADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

0.37

+1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.20

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.20

+0.42

Correlation

The correlation between LBFFX and PTA is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LBFFX vs. PTA - Dividend Comparison

LBFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than PTA's 8.47% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LBFFX
Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F
1.44%1.80%2.22%1.95%2.60%18.44%16.27%8.71%4.91%2.47%3.64%3.38%
PTA
Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund
8.47%8.33%8.37%8.93%8.83%7.10%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LBFFX vs. PTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBFFX drawdown since its inception was -41.13%, which is greater than PTA's maximum drawdown of -28.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBFFX and PTA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LBFFXPTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.13%

-28.71%

-12.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.07%

-10.21%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.86%

-28.71%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.96%

-5.30%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-9.21%

-1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

3.80%

-1.80%

Volatility

LBFFX vs. PTA - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX) and Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund (PTA) have volatilities of 6.38% and 6.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LBFFXPTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

6.14%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.18%

8.14%

+4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.53%

13.75%

+0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.89%

14.54%

-1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.52%

14.15%

-0.63%