LBFFX vs. HPF
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX) and John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II (HPF).
LBFFX is managed by Lord Abbett. HPF is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Jan 1, 2005.
Performance
LBFFX vs. HPF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LBFFX vs. HPF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBFFX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F | 4.02% | 22.11% | 13.82% | 7.16% | -23.30% | 1.26% | 64.16% | 24.19% | -5.89% | 16.68% |
HPF John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II | -0.34% | 6.34% | 14.41% | 10.78% | -18.44% | 17.90% | -7.67% | 27.95% | -5.38% | 14.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LBFFX achieves a 4.02% return, which is significantly higher than HPF's -0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, LBFFX has outperformed HPF with an annualized return of 11.86%, while HPF has yielded a comparatively lower 5.49% annualized return.
LBFFX
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- -4.19%
- YTD
- 4.02%
- 6M
- 6.17%
- 1Y
- 28.37%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 3.20%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
HPF
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- -3.26%
- 1Y
- 3.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.91%
- 5Y*
- 2.76%
- 10Y*
- 5.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LBFFX vs. HPF - Expense Ratio Comparison
LBFFX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than HPF's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LBFFX vs. HPF — Risk / Return Rank
LBFFX
HPF
LBFFX vs. HPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX) and John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II (HPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LBFFX | HPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.00 | 0.28 | +1.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.69 | 0.44 | +2.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.07 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | 0.34 | +3.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.35 | 1.02 | +13.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LBFFX | HPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 0.28 | +1.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.18 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.25 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.27 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between LBFFX and HPF is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LBFFX vs. HPF - Dividend Comparison
LBFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than HPF's 9.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBFFX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F | 1.44% | 1.80% | 2.22% | 1.95% | 2.60% | 18.44% | 16.27% | 8.71% | 4.91% | 2.47% | 3.64% | 3.38% |
HPF John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II | 9.47% | 9.22% | 8.95% | 9.39% | 9.45% | 7.10% | 7.80% | 7.32% | 8.96% | 7.82% | 8.30% | 7.85% |
Drawdowns
LBFFX vs. HPF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LBFFX drawdown since its inception was -41.13%, smaller than the maximum HPF drawdown of -66.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBFFX and HPF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LBFFX | HPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.13% | -66.73% | +25.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.07% | -9.41% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.86% | -31.24% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.61% | -54.76% | +21.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.96% | -5.65% | +0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.40% | -8.56% | -1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 3.16% | -1.16% |
Volatility
LBFFX vs. HPF - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F (LBFFX) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II (HPF) at 4.53%. This indicates that LBFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LBFFX | HPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.38% | 4.53% | +1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.18% | 5.84% | +6.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.53% | 11.98% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 15.53% | -2.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 22.09% | -8.57% |