LBETX vs. TSAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about LGM Risk Managed Total Return Fund (LBETX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX).
LBETX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 11, 2017. TSAIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Dec 8, 2011.
Performance
LBETX vs. TSAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LBETX vs. TSAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBETX LGM Risk Managed Total Return Fund | -3.92% | 2.15% | 10.79% | 9.45% | -1.48% | 3.85% | -11.03% | 7.96% | 5.83% | 1.67% |
TSAIX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund | -5.91% | 20.04% | 15.46% | 22.72% | -19.57% | 17.10% | 19.69% | 27.97% | -11.27% | 9.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LBETX achieves a -3.92% return, which is significantly higher than TSAIX's -5.91% return.
LBETX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.58%
- YTD
- -3.92%
- 6M
- -2.37%
- 1Y
- -0.70%
- 3Y*
- 5.71%
- 5Y*
- 4.00%
- 10Y*
- —
TSAIX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -9.58%
- YTD
- -5.91%
- 6M
- -3.06%
- 1Y
- 15.39%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LBETX vs. TSAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LBETX has a 2.32% expense ratio, which is higher than TSAIX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LBETX vs. TSAIX — Risk / Return Rank
LBETX
TSAIX
LBETX vs. TSAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LGM Risk Managed Total Return Fund (LBETX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LBETX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | 0.92 | -1.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | 1.37 | -1.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.20 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 1.08 | -1.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 4.80 | -5.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LBETX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | 0.92 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.46 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.65 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between LBETX and TSAIX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LBETX vs. TSAIX - Dividend Comparison
LBETX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than TSAIX's 7.84% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBETX LGM Risk Managed Total Return Fund | 0.39% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.15% | 3.88% | 5.51% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSAIX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund | 7.84% | 7.38% | 2.94% | 1.81% | 9.27% | 11.82% | 5.59% | 5.71% | 5.71% | 1.13% | 4.12% | 7.19% |
Drawdowns
LBETX vs. TSAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LBETX drawdown since its inception was -18.47%, smaller than the maximum TSAIX drawdown of -34.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBETX and TSAIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LBETX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.47% | -34.58% | +16.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.91% | -11.72% | +6.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.93% | -28.28% | +21.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.91% | -10.28% | +5.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.45% | -4.96% | -0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.20% | 2.77% | -1.57% |
Volatility
LBETX vs. TSAIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LGM Risk Managed Total Return Fund (LBETX) is 1.77%, while TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that LBETX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LBETX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.77% | 5.29% | -3.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.88% | 9.81% | -6.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.17% | 17.09% | -11.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.99% | 16.15% | -11.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.05% | 17.59% | -11.54% |