PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LBAY vs. NVDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LBAY vs. NVDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBAY achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly lower than NVDY's 14.49% return.


LBAY

1D
0.43%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
6.83%
6M
9.25%
1Y
9.13%
3Y*
3.68%
5Y*
3.91%
10Y*

NVDY

1D
1.27%
1M
7.84%
YTD
14.49%
6M
17.01%
1Y
47.85%
3Y*
55.07%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBAY vs. NVDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LBAY
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF
6.83%4.08%-3.49%0.62%
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
14.49%27.38%114.23%42.02%

Correlation

The correlation between LBAY and NVDY is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023

-0.20

The correlation between LBAY and NVDY shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (1 year) to -0.20 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LBAY vs. NVDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBAY
LBAY Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
LBAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBAY Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
LBAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBAY Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDY
NVDY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NVDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDY Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDY Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBAY vs. NVDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LBAYNVDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.29

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

3.75

-2.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.94

9.22

-7.27

LBAY vs. NVDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBAY Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the NVDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBAY and NVDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LBAYNVDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

1.76

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

1.65

-1.06

Drawdowns

LBAY vs. NVDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBAY drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum NVDY drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBAY and NVDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LBAYNVDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.99%

-34.08%

+18.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-12.81%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.57%

-34.08%

+19.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.34%

-5.47%

-4.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.80%

-6.15%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.71%

5.21%

-0.50%

Volatility

LBAY vs. NVDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) is 3.80%, while YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that LBAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LBAYNVDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

9.43%

-5.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.82%

20.71%

-7.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.26%

27.33%

-12.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.59%

38.22%

-24.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.73%

38.22%

-24.49%

LBAY vs. NVDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBAY has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

LBAY vs. NVDY - Dividend Comparison

LBAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, less than NVDY's 62.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
LBAY
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF
3.79%3.80%3.77%3.47%2.74%2.96%0.29%
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
62.14%83.10%83.65%22.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LBAY and NVDY have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDY has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to LBAY (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBAY dropped -15.99% vs NVDY's -34.08%.

On 3-year performance, NVDY leads with 55.07% vs 3.68% for LBAY. On fees, NVDY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, LBAY has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, NVDY has performed better with a 55.07% return vs 3.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for LBAY.

NVDY has the higher dividend yield at 62.14%, compared with 3.79% for LBAY.

LBAY is categorized as Long-Short, while NVDY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for LBAY and 0.99% for NVDY.

NVDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LBAY and NVDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer