LAVLX vs. FCMVX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

LAVLX (Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund) and FCMVX (Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, LAVLX returned 9.55%/yr vs 26.62%/yr for FCMVX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LAVLX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FCMVX.

Performance

LAVLX vs. FCMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAVLX achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly lower than FCMVX's 25.05% return.

LAVLX

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: -1.13%
• 6M: 8.07%
• YTD: 11.91%
• 1Y: 21.02%
• 3Y*: 13.62%
• 5Y*: 9.55%
• 10Y*: 8.58%

FCMVX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 1.81%
• 6M: 16.72%
• YTD: 25.05%
• 1Y: 38.49%
• 3Y*: 42.59%
• 5Y*: 26.62%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAVLX vs. FCMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LAVLX Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund	11.91%	7.28%	14.96%	15.50%	-11.02%	28.79%	2.73%	22.92%	-14.55%	3.14%
FCMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund	25.05%	12.62%	87.16%	23.07%	-10.26%	34.12%	0.52%	23.65%	-18.69%	12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between LAVLX and FCMVX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017	0.95

The correlation between LAVLX and FCMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LAVLX vs. FCMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAVLX

LAVLX Risk / Return Rank: 65
LAVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
LAVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
LAVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
LAVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
LAVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

FCMVX

FCMVX Risk / Return Rank: 88
FCMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FCMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FCMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FCMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FCMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAVLX vs. FCMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LAVLX	FCMVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.36	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	3.39	-0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.41	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	3.83	-1.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.30	14.78	-4.48

LAVLX vs. FCMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAVLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the FCMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAVLX and FCMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LAVLX vs. FCMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAVLX drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, which is greater than FCMVX's maximum drawdown of -44.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAVLX and FCMVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAVLX	FCMVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.58%	-44.63%	-15.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.72%	-10.21%	+2.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.91%	-38.56%	+17.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.76%	-38.56%	+16.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.69%	-0.19%	-1.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.09%	-9.24%	+1.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	2.64%	-0.54%

Volatility

LAVLX vs. FCMVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX) is 2.54%, while Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that LAVLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LAVLX	FCMVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.54%	3.98%	-1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.53%	12.37%	-2.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.64%	16.64%	-4.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.24%	60.60%	-43.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.48%	47.52%	-28.04%

LAVLX vs. FCMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAVLX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FCMVX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

LAVLX vs. FCMVX - Dividend Comparison

LAVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, more than FCMVX's 3.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund	3.95%	6.68%	76.67%	1.29%	1.68%	1.39%	2.19%	1.68%	2.99%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%
LAVLX Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund	6.29%	7.04%	9.70%	1.23%	8.40%	8.51%	1.19%	3.19%	6.55%	2.67%	0.60%	0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LAVLX and FCMVX in my portfolio?

LAVLX and FCMVX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LAVLX or FCMVX?

FCMVX has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to LAVLX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAVLX dropped -60.58% vs FCMVX's -44.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.