PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAVLX vs. ETHSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LAVLX vs. ETHSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX) and Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAVLX achieves a 11.88% return, which is significantly higher than ETHSX's -4.74% return. Over the past 10 years, LAVLX has outperformed ETHSX with an annualized return of 8.84%, while ETHSX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.46% annualized return.


LAVLX

1D
1.92%
1M
3.03%
YTD
11.88%
6M
10.54%
1Y
25.10%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
8.84%

ETHSX

1D
1.28%
1M
3.43%
YTD
-4.74%
6M
-3.58%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
4.06%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*
7.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAVLX vs. ETHSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LAVLX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund
11.88%7.28%14.96%15.50%-11.02%28.79%2.73%22.92%-14.55%7.06%
ETHSX
Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund
-4.74%10.23%3.48%5.67%-9.41%22.02%13.04%25.99%5.87%16.24%

Correlation

The correlation between LAVLX and ETHSX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 1985

0.61

The correlation between LAVLX and ETHSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAVLX vs. ETHSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAVLX
LAVLX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
LAVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
LAVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHSX
ETHSX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
ETHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAVLX vs. ETHSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX) and Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LAVLXETHSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.06

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

0.33

+2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.70

0.77

+10.94

LAVLX vs. ETHSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAVLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the ETHSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAVLX and ETHSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LAVLX vs. ETHSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAVLX drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, smaller than the maximum ETHSX drawdown of -90.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAVLX and ETHSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAVLXETHSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.58%

-90.06%

+29.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-12.35%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-18.91%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.76%

-19.58%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.16%

-27.43%

-14.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-9.31%

+8.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-43.95%

+35.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

5.27%

-3.17%

Volatility

LAVLX vs. ETHSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund (LAVLX) is 4.56%, while Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that LAVLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAVLXETHSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

5.26%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

10.98%

-1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

15.40%

-2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

14.98%

+2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.58%

16.27%

+3.31%

LAVLX vs. ETHSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAVLX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHSX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

LAVLX vs. ETHSX - Dividend Comparison

LAVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, less than ETHSX's 7.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETHSX
Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund
7.73%7.36%4.81%2.48%4.43%8.25%7.33%5.39%5.51%2.82%12.75%9.70%
LAVLX
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock Fund
6.29%7.04%9.70%1.23%8.40%8.51%1.19%3.19%6.55%2.67%0.60%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


LAVLX and ETHSX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETHSX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to LAVLX (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAVLX dropped -60.58% vs ETHSX's -90.06%.

LAVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAVLX and ETHSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer