LASYX vs. EIGMX
LASYX (Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund) and EIGMX (Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, LASYX returned 3.77%/yr vs 4.98%/yr for EIGMX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LASYX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for EIGMX.
Performance
LASYX vs. EIGMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LASYX achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly lower than EIGMX's 5.19% return. Over the past 10 years, LASYX has underperformed EIGMX with an annualized return of 3.77%, while EIGMX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.98% annualized return.
LASYX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 2.81%
- 3Y*
- 7.30%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- 3.77%
EIGMX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 5.00%
- YTD
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 11.68%
- 3Y*
- 9.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- 4.98%
LASYX vs. EIGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LASYX Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund | -0.07% | 7.44% | 8.29% | 7.89% | -7.97% | 1.33% | 10.19% | 3.96% | 0.53% | 3.38% |
EIGMX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund | 5.19% | 11.37% | 8.69% | 6.99% | -0.47% | 2.19% | 3.59% | 9.76% | -3.29% | 4.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between LASYX and EIGMX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2010 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LASYX vs. EIGMX — Risk / Return Rank
LASYX
EIGMX
LASYX vs. EIGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund (LASYX) and Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LASYX | EIGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 3.03 | -1.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 8.22 | -7.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.17 | 29.74 | -26.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LASYX vs. EIGMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LASYX drawdown since its inception was -11.24%, which is greater than EIGMX's maximum drawdown of -9.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LASYX and EIGMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LASYX | EIGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -9.42% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.90% | -1.44% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.90% | -1.63% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.24% | -7.39% | -3.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.24% | -9.42% | -1.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | 0.00% | -1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -0.92% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.40% | +0.57% |
Volatility
LASYX vs. EIGMX - Volatility Comparison
Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund (LASYX) has a higher volatility of 0.72% compared to Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (EIGMX) at 0.47%. This indicates that LASYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LASYX | EIGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.72% | 0.47% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 1.64% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99% | 1.87% | +1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.34% | 2.61% | +0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.30% | 2.50% | +0.80% |
LASYX vs. EIGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LASYX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EIGMX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
LASYX vs. EIGMX - Dividend Comparison
LASYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than EIGMX's 6.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIGMX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund | 6.64% | 5.72% | 6.16% | 5.79% | 4.78% | 4.18% | 4.37% | 5.44% | 3.72% | 3.42% | 4.02% | 5.54% |
LASYX Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund | 2.70% | 3.64% | 5.61% | 5.48% | 4.05% | 2.21% | 2.28% | 3.07% | 3.69% | 2.92% | 2.34% | 3.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LASYX and EIGMX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LASYX has higher volatility (0.72%) compared to EIGMX (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LASYX dropped -11.24% vs EIGMX's -9.42%.
EIGMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LASYX and EIGMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer