LASE vs. AAPL
LASE (Laser Photonics Corporation) and AAPL (Apple Inc) are both stocks. LASE operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while AAPL operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 3 years, LASE returned -2.24%/yr vs 20.25%/yr for AAPL. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LASE vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LASE achieves a 26.72% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 14.34% return.
LASE
- 1D
- 29.34%
- 1M
- 335.69%
- YTD
- 26.72%
- 6M
- 3.64%
- 1Y
- 32.63%
- 3Y*
- -2.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 12.18%
- YTD
- 14.34%
- 6M
- 9.39%
- 1Y
- 53.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- 20.38%
- 10Y*
- 30.12%
LASE vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LASE Laser Photonics Corporation | 26.72% | -57.27% | 389.83% | -42.16% | -20.93% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 14.34% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -5.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between LASE and AAPL is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2022 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
LASE:
-$0.48
AAPL:
$8.24
LASE:
6.88
AAPL:
10.23
LASE:
$7.14M
AAPL:
$451.44B
LASE:
$2.22M
AAPL:
$216.07B
LASE:
-$8.37M
AAPL:
$153.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LASE vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
LASE
AAPL
LASE vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Laser Photonics Corporation (LASE) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LASE | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.43 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 3.88 | -3.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.53 | 9.76 | -9.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LASE | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | 2.40 | -2.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.44 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
LASE vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LASE drawdown since its inception was -96.80%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LASE and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LASE | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.80% | -81.80% | -15.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -90.76% | -13.80% | -76.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.80% | -33.36% | -63.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.35% | -1.57% | -81.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.16% | -29.61% | -40.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 61.35% | 5.47% | +55.88% |
Volatility
LASE vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
Laser Photonics Corporation (LASE) has a higher volatility of 100.29% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.46%. This indicates that LASE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LASE | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 100.29% | 5.46% | +94.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 142.09% | 15.91% | +126.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 230.98% | 22.32% | +208.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 184.60% | 27.46% | +157.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 184.60% | 28.89% | +155.71% |
Dividends
LASE vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
LASE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
LASE Laser Photonics Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LASE vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Laser Photonics Corporation and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LASE and AAPL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LASE has higher volatility (100.29%) compared to AAPL (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LASE dropped -96.80% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LASE and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer