PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAPR vs. XISE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LAPR vs. XISE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September (XISE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAPR achieves a 3.32% return, which is significantly higher than XISE's 3.00% return.


LAPR

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.72%
YTD
3.32%
6M
3.77%
1Y
7.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XISE

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.75%
YTD
3.00%
6M
3.75%
1Y
6.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAPR vs. XISE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LAPR and XISE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.54

The correlation between LAPR and XISE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAPR vs. XISE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAPR
LAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
LAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
LAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

XISE
XISE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XISE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XISE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XISE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
XISE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XISE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAPR vs. XISE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September (XISE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LAPRXISEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+8.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.93

1.53

+1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

29.36

3.64

+25.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

144.96

20.31

+124.65

LAPR vs. XISE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAPR Sharpe Ratio is 5.58, which is higher than the XISE Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAPR and XISE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LAPRXISEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.58

2.31

+3.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.97

1.39

+0.59

Drawdowns

LAPR vs. XISE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAPR drawdown since its inception was -3.81%, smaller than the maximum XISE drawdown of -6.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAPR and XISE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAPRXISEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-6.17%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.24%

-1.88%

+1.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.02%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-0.24%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

0.34%

-0.29%

Volatility

LAPR vs. XISE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) is 0.32%, while FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF – September (XISE) has a volatility of 0.37%. This indicates that LAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XISE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAPRXISEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.32%

0.37%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.00%

2.33%

-1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27%

2.96%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.30%

4.92%

-1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.30%

4.92%

-1.62%

LAPR vs. XISE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than XISE's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

LAPR vs. XISE - Dividend Comparison

LAPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, less than XISE's 5.92% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


LAPR and XISE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XISE has higher volatility (0.37%) compared to LAPR (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAPR dropped -3.81% vs XISE's -6.17%.

On 1-year performance, LAPR leads with 7.01% vs 6.80% for XISE. On fees, LAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LAPR has performed better with a 7.01% return vs 6.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XISE.

XISE has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 5.53% for LAPR.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for LAPR and 0.85% for XISE.

LAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.58 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAPR and XISE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer