LAPR vs. QBUL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

LAPR (Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April) and QBUL (TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LAPR returned 7.17% vs 6.05% for QBUL. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

LAPR vs. QBUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) and TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAPR achieves a 3.36% return, which is significantly higher than QBUL's 2.81% return.

LAPR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 3.36%
• 6M: 3.82%
• 1Y: 7.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QBUL

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 1.73%
• YTD: 2.81%
• 6M: 2.73%
• 1Y: 6.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAPR vs. QBUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LAPR Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April	3.36%	5.81%	3.05%
QBUL TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF	2.81%	4.87%	0.58%

Correlation

The correlation between LAPR and QBUL is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024	0.45

Return for Risk

LAPR vs. QBUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAPR

LAPR Risk / Return Rank: 99
LAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
LAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
LAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
LAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 99

QBUL

QBUL Risk / Return Rank: 47
QBUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
QBUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
QBUL Omega Ratio Rank: 50
QBUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
QBUL Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAPR vs. QBUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) and TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LAPR	QBUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	5.70	1.72	+3.97
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	12.42	2.53	+9.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.99	1.32	+1.67
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	30.20	2.53	+27.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	151.22	5.02	+146.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LAPR vs. QBUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAPR Sharpe Ratio is 5.70, which is higher than the QBUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAPR and QBUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LAPR	QBUL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.70	1.72	+3.97
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.98	1.15	+0.83

Drawdowns

LAPR vs. QBUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAPR drawdown since its inception was -3.81%, which is greater than QBUL's maximum drawdown of -2.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAPR and QBUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAPR	QBUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.81%	-2.45%	-1.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.24%	-2.45%	+2.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	0.00%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.11%	-0.98%	+0.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.05%	1.24%	-1.19%

Volatility

LAPR vs. QBUL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) is 0.33%, while TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) has a volatility of 1.26%. This indicates that LAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LAPR	QBUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.33%	1.26%	-0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.99%	2.23%	-1.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.26%	3.53%	-2.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.30%	3.78%	-0.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.30%	3.78%	-0.48%

LAPR vs. QBUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LAPR and QBUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

LAPR vs. QBUL - Dividend Comparison

LAPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, less than QBUL's 8.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LAPR Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April	5.52%	5.40%	4.21%
QBUL TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF	8.70%	8.94%	1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LAPR and QBUL in my portfolio?

LAPR and QBUL have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LAPR or QBUL?

QBUL has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to LAPR (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAPR dropped -3.81% vs QBUL's -2.45%.

Which ETF is better, LAPR or QBUL?

On 1-year performance, LAPR leads with 7.17% vs 6.05% for QBUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, LAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LAPR or QBUL?

Over the 1-year period, LAPR has performed better with a 7.17% return vs 6.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LAPR or QBUL?

LAPR and QBUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LAPR or QBUL?

QBUL has the higher dividend yield at 8.70%, compared with 5.52% for LAPR.

What is the main difference between LAPR and QBUL?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and TrueShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.70 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.