PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAPIX vs. LBNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LAPIX vs. LBNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Core Plus Bond Fund (LAPIX) and Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAPIX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than LBNDX's 1.63% return. Over the past 10 years, LAPIX has underperformed LBNDX with an annualized return of 2.08%, while LBNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.31% annualized return.


LAPIX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.59%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.54%
1Y
6.10%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
0.51%
10Y*
2.08%

LBNDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.99%
1Y
8.47%
3Y*
7.17%
5Y*
1.66%
10Y*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAPIX vs. LBNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LAPIX
Lord Abbett Core Plus Bond Fund
0.50%7.63%3.12%6.31%-14.72%0.29%7.43%10.10%-0.70%3.97%
LBNDX
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund
1.63%8.42%6.29%6.38%-13.67%3.25%7.65%13.40%-3.76%9.23%

Correlation

The correlation between LAPIX and LBNDX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2016

0.60

The correlation between LAPIX and LBNDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAPIX vs. LBNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAPIX
LAPIX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
LAPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
LAPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

LBNDX
LBNDX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LBNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
LBNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAPIX vs. LBNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Core Plus Bond Fund (LAPIX) and Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LAPIXLBNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.44

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

2.12

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.06

8.69

-2.63

LAPIX vs. LBNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the LBNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAPIX and LBNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LAPIXLBNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

2.14

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.36

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.86

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

1.10

-0.60

Drawdowns

LAPIX vs. LBNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAPIX drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, smaller than the maximum LBNDX drawdown of -26.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAPIX and LBNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LAPIXLBNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.94%

-26.67%

+7.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

-4.08%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.41%

-4.51%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.94%

-17.33%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.94%

-19.77%

+0.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-0.36%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.25%

-3.52%

-0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.99%

+0.02%

Volatility

LAPIX vs. LBNDX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Core Plus Bond Fund (LAPIX) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund (LBNDX) at 1.17%. This indicates that LAPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LBNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LAPIXLBNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

1.17%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

3.14%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.91%

4.05%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.51%

4.69%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.65%

5.04%

-0.39%

LAPIX vs. LBNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAPIX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than LBNDX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

LAPIX vs. LBNDX - Dividend Comparison

LAPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, less than LBNDX's 6.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAPIX
Lord Abbett Core Plus Bond Fund
5.18%5.20%5.05%4.32%2.95%2.42%4.45%4.00%4.15%2.57%0.65%0.00%
LBNDX
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund
6.04%5.92%5.38%4.66%3.67%3.71%3.72%4.02%6.43%4.82%4.58%5.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


LAPIX and LBNDX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAPIX has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to LBNDX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAPIX dropped -18.94% vs LBNDX's -26.67%.

LBNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAPIX and LBNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer