LAPIX vs. SRBFX
LAPIX (Lord Abbett Core Plus Bond Fund) and SRBFX (Columbia Total Return Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, LAPIX returned 2.03%/yr vs 2.30%/yr for SRBFX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LAPIX charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SRBFX.
Performance
LAPIX vs. SRBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAPIX achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than SRBFX's 0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, LAPIX has underperformed SRBFX with an annualized return of 2.03%, while SRBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.30% annualized return.
LAPIX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 4.94%
- 3Y*
- 5.04%
- 5Y*
- 0.33%
- 10Y*
- 2.03%
SRBFX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 5.29%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- -0.36%
- 10Y*
- 2.30%
LAPIX vs. SRBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAPIX Lord Abbett Core Plus Bond Fund | 0.18% | 7.63% | 3.12% | 6.31% | -14.72% | 0.29% | 7.43% | 10.10% | -0.70% | 3.97% |
SRBFX Columbia Total Return Bond Fund | 0.79% | 8.91% | 1.49% | 7.35% | -17.65% | 0.23% | 12.20% | 9.44% | 0.38% | 3.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAPIX and SRBFX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016 | 0.92 |
The correlation between LAPIX and SRBFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAPIX vs. SRBFX — Risk / Return Rank
LAPIX
SRBFX
LAPIX vs. SRBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Core Plus Bond Fund (LAPIX) and Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LAPIX | SRBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.23 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 1.84 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.88 | 5.28 | -0.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LAPIX vs. SRBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAPIX drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, smaller than the maximum SRBFX drawdown of -24.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAPIX and SRBFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAPIX | SRBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.94% | -24.34% | +5.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.21% | -3.13% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.41% | -6.28% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.94% | -22.97% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.94% | -22.97% | +4.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.57% | -2.95% | +1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -4.55% | +0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 1.09% | -0.03% |
Volatility
LAPIX vs. SRBFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lord Abbett Core Plus Bond Fund (LAPIX) is 1.04%, while Columbia Total Return Bond Fund (SRBFX) has a volatility of 1.24%. This indicates that LAPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAPIX | SRBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.04% | 1.24% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.90% | 3.22% | -0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.86% | 4.37% | -0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.52% | 6.64% | -1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.66% | 5.45% | -0.79% |
LAPIX vs. SRBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LAPIX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than SRBFX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
LAPIX vs. SRBFX - Dividend Comparison
LAPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, more than SRBFX's 4.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAPIX Lord Abbett Core Plus Bond Fund | 5.20% | 5.20% | 5.05% | 4.32% | 2.95% | 2.42% | 4.45% | 4.00% | 4.15% | 2.57% | 0.65% | 0.00% |
SRBFX Columbia Total Return Bond Fund | 4.85% | 4.86% | 4.11% | 3.74% | 3.72% | 3.23% | 7.56% | 4.59% | 2.85% | 2.77% | 3.93% | 3.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, LAPIX and SRBFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SRBFX has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to LAPIX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAPIX dropped -18.94% vs SRBFX's -24.34%.
LAPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAPIX and SRBFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer