LANYX vs. LAFFX

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

LANYX (Lord Abbett New York Tax Free Fund) and LAFFX (Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund) are both mutual funds - LANYX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Lord Abbett, while LAFFX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Lord Abbett. Over the past 10 years, LANYX returned 1.73%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for LAFFX. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LANYX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for LAFFX.

Performance

LANYX vs. LAFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett New York Tax Free Fund (LANYX) and Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LANYX achieves a 3.22% return, which is significantly lower than LAFFX's 12.38% return. Over the past 10 years, LANYX has underperformed LAFFX with an annualized return of 1.73%, while LAFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.99% annualized return.

LANYX

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 1.16%
• 6M: 3.22%
• YTD: 3.22%
• 1Y: 7.65%
• 3Y*: 3.69%
• 5Y*: 0.12%
• 10Y*: 1.73%

LAFFX

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 3.11%
• 6M: 12.38%
• YTD: 12.38%
• 1Y: 21.83%
• 3Y*: 18.56%
• 5Y*: 10.75%
• 10Y*: 10.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LANYX vs. LAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LANYX Lord Abbett New York Tax Free Fund	3.22%	2.80%	1.62%	7.89%	-13.80%	3.41%	4.54%	8.41%	0.98%	4.68%
LAFFX Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund	12.38%	15.75%	17.30%	10.50%	-9.80%	26.77%	-1.29%	25.24%	-7.59%	16.16%

Correlation

The correlation between LANYX and LAFFX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 1984	0.04

The correlation between LANYX and LAFFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (10 years) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LANYX vs. LAFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LANYX

LANYX Risk / Return Rank: 80
LANYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
LANYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
LANYX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
LANYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
LANYX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

LAFFX

LAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 74
LAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
LAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
LAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
LAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
LAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LANYX vs. LAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett New York Tax Free Fund (LANYX) and Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LANYX	LAFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	2.04	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	2.88	+0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.36	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	2.89	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.66	12.09	-2.43

LANYX vs. LAFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LANYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the LAFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LANYX and LAFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LANYX vs. LAFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LANYX drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, smaller than the maximum LAFFX drawdown of -60.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LANYX and LAFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LANYX	LAFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.61%	-60.50%	+40.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.73%	-7.59%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.48%	-15.38%	+7.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.61%	-19.50%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.61%	-39.59%	+19.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	0.00%	-0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-9.01%	+6.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.79%	1.81%	-1.02%

Volatility

LANYX vs. LAFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett New York Tax Free Fund (LANYX) is 0.59%, while Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that LANYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LANYX	LAFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.59%	3.50%	-2.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.44%	8.71%	-6.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.19%	10.78%	-7.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.83%	14.61%	-9.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.74%	17.39%	-12.65%

LANYX vs. LAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LANYX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than LAFFX's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

LANYX vs. LAFFX - Dividend Comparison

LANYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than LAFFX's 6.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LAFFX Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund	6.38%	7.49%	6.32%	1.69%	7.86%	3.86%	1.93%	4.31%	11.75%	11.96%	7.76%	10.67%
LANYX Lord Abbett New York Tax Free Fund	3.56%	4.04%	2.93%	2.65%	2.06%	2.10%	2.27%	2.61%	2.58%	2.51%	2.78%	3.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LANYX and LAFFX in my portfolio?

LANYX and LAFFX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LANYX or LAFFX?

LAFFX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to LANYX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LANYX dropped -19.61% vs LAFFX's -60.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LANYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.