LANYX vs. LALDX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LANYX (Lord Abbett New York Tax Free Fund) and LALDX (Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund) are both mutual funds - LANYX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Lord Abbett, while LALDX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Lord Abbett. Over the past 10 years, LANYX returned 1.51%/yr vs 2.34%/yr for LALDX. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LANYX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for LALDX.

Performance

LANYX vs. LALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett New York Tax Free Fund (LANYX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LANYX achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly higher than LALDX's 0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, LANYX has underperformed LALDX with an annualized return of 1.51%, while LALDX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.34% annualized return.

LANYX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -2.16%
• 6M: 0.39%
• YTD: 0.98%
• 1Y: 5.93%
• 3Y*: 2.86%
• 5Y*: -0.47%
• 10Y*: 1.51%
• ALL TIME*: 4.06%

LALDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.26%
• 6M: 0.43%
• YTD: 0.83%
• 1Y: 2.93%
• 3Y*: 4.56%
• 5Y*: 1.97%
• 10Y*: 2.34%
• ALL TIME*: 3.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LALDX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
LANYX Lord Abbett New York Tax Free Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LANYX vs. LALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LANYX Lord Abbett New York Tax Free Fund	0.98%	2.80%	1.62%	7.89%	-13.80%	3.41%	4.54%	8.41%	0.98%	4.68%
LALDX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund	0.83%	5.70%	4.48%	4.76%	-5.48%	1.17%	2.98%	5.42%	1.24%	2.30%

Correlation

The correlation between LANYX and LALDX is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 1993	0.43

Return for Risk

LANYX vs. LALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LANYX

LANYX Risk / Return Rank: 83
LANYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
LANYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
LANYX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
LANYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
LANYX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

LALDX

LALDX Risk / Return Rank: 78
LALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
LALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
LALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
LALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
LALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LANYX vs. LALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett New York Tax Free Fund (LANYX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LANYX	LALDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	1.45	+0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	2.40	+0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.41	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	2.85	-0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.98	11.80	-2.82

LANYX vs. LALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LANYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the LALDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LANYX and LALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LANYX vs. LALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LANYX drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, which is greater than LALDX's maximum drawdown of -10.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LANYX and LALDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LANYX	LALDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.61%	-10.58%	-9.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.73%	-1.29%	-1.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.39%	-1.29%	-5.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.55%	-7.60%	-11.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.61%	-9.67%	-9.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.40%	-0.26%	-2.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-0.82%	-2.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	0.31%	+0.47%

Volatility

LANYX vs. LALDX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett New York Tax Free Fund (LANYX) has a higher volatility of 1.06% compared to Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LALDX) at 0.71%. This indicates that LANYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LANYX	LALDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.06%	0.71%	+0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.62%	2.07%	+0.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.25%	2.52%	+0.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.85%	2.73%	+2.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.75%	2.61%	+2.14%

LANYX vs. LALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LANYX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than LALDX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

LANYX vs. LALDX - Dividend Comparison

LANYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than LALDX's 4.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LALDX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund	4.49%	5.01%	4.11%	4.09%	2.42%	2.37%	2.88%	3.59%	3.88%	3.71%	3.95%	3.95%
LANYX Lord Abbett New York Tax Free Fund	3.35%	4.04%	2.93%	2.65%	2.06%	2.10%	2.27%	2.61%	2.58%	2.51%	2.78%	3.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LANYX and LALDX in my portfolio?

LANYX and LALDX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LANYX or LALDX?

LANYX has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to LALDX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LANYX dropped -19.61% vs LALDX's -10.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LANYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.