LALT vs. TDIV
LALT (First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF) and TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - LALT is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by First Trust, while TDIV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. LALT is actively managed, while TDIV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LALT returned 10.48%/yr vs 33.27%/yr for TDIV. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LALT charges 1.94%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDIV.
Performance
LALT vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LALT achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 30.57% return.
LALT
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDIV
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- 15.82%
- YTD
- 30.57%
- 6M
- 28.79%
- 1Y
- 53.63%
- 3Y*
- 33.27%
- 5Y*
- 19.29%
- 10Y*
- 19.34%
LALT vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 10.70% | 10.79% | 8.77% | 0.88% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 30.57% | 25.27% | 24.43% | 24.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between LALT and TDIV is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023 | 0.33 |
The correlation between LALT and TDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LALT vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LALT
TDIV
Financial Services
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
LALT
TDIV
-
Technology
LALT
TDIV
Consumer Cyclical
LALT
TDIV
-
Industrials
LALT
TDIV
Healthcare
LALT
TDIV
-
Energy
LALT
TDIV
-
Consumer Defensive
LALT
TDIV
-
Communication Services
LALT
TDIV
Basic Materials
LALT
TDIV
-
Real Estate
LALT
TDIV
-
Utilities
LALT
TDIV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LALT vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank
LALT
TDIV
LALT vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LALT | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.49 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.79 | 5.02 | +2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.25 | 15.64 | +14.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LALT | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.28 | 2.93 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.62 | 0.88 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
LALT vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LALT drawdown since its inception was -6.97%, smaller than the maximum TDIV drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LALT and TDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LALT | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -31.97% | +25.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -10.74% | +7.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.97% | -23.00% | +16.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -1.79% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -4.84% | +3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | 3.44% | -2.70% |
Volatility
LALT vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) is 1.23%, while First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that LALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LALT | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 6.86% | -5.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.40% | 13.91% | -8.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.81% | 18.47% | -11.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 20.67% | -14.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 20.85% | -15.07% |
LALT vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LALT has a 1.94% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LALT vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison
LALT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than TDIV's 1.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 3.68% | 2.03% | 2.06% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 1.12% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.74% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 2.07% | 2.27% | 2.97% | 2.27% | 2.45% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LALT and TDIV have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TDIV has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to LALT (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LALT dropped -6.97% vs TDIV's -31.97%.
On 3-year performance, TDIV leads with 33.27% vs 10.48% for LALT. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, LALT has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 33.27% return vs 10.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.94% for LALT.
LALT has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.12% for TDIV.
LALT is categorized as Global Allocation, while TDIV is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.94% for LALT and 0.50% for TDIV.
LALT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LALT and TDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer