LALT vs. HECA
LALT (First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF) and HECA (Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LALT charges 1.94%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for HECA.
Performance
LALT vs. HECA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LALT achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly higher than HECA's 0.22% return.
LALT
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HECA
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LALT vs. HECA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 10.70% | 8.82% |
HECA Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF | 0.22% | 12.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between LALT and HECA is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LALT vs. HECA — Risk / Return Rank
LALT
HECA
LALT vs. HECA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) and Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF (HECA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LALT | HECA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LALT | HECA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.62 | 1.15 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
LALT vs. HECA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LALT drawdown since its inception was -6.97%, smaller than the maximum HECA drawdown of -11.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LALT and HECA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LALT | HECA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -11.81% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -10.09% | +9.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -3.15% | +2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | — | — |
Volatility
LALT vs. HECA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LALT | HECA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.40% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.81% | 12.44% | -5.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 12.44% | -6.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 12.44% | -6.66% |
LALT vs. HECA - Expense Ratio Comparison
LALT has a 1.94% expense ratio, which is higher than HECA's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
LALT vs. HECA - Dividend Comparison
LALT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than HECA's 2.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HECA Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF | 2.01% | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LALT First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 3.68% | 2.03% | 2.06% | 2.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LALT and HECA have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HECA is cheaper at 1.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HECA is cheaper with a 1.02% expense ratio, compared with 1.94% for LALT.
LALT has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 2.01% for HECA.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Hedgeye. Their fees differ too: 1.94% for LALT and 1.02% for HECA.
Find the right allocation for LALT and HECA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer