PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LALT vs. DYTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LALT vs. DYTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) and SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LALT achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly higher than DYTA's 8.48% return.


LALT

1D
-0.44%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
10.70%
6M
10.50%
1Y
22.25%
3Y*
10.48%
5Y*
10Y*

DYTA

1D
-0.27%
1M
5.10%
YTD
8.48%
6M
9.28%
1Y
15.98%
3Y*
12.06%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LALT vs. DYTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LALT
First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF
10.70%10.79%8.77%1.46%
DYTA
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF
8.48%6.95%13.59%8.73%

Correlation

The correlation between LALT and DYTA is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2023

0.38

The correlation between LALT and DYTA shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.38 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LALT vs. DYTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LALT
LALT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
LALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LALT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LALT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

DYTA
DYTA Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
DYTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYTA Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DYTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYTA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LALT vs. DYTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) and SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LALTDYTADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.28

1.65

+1.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.62

2.35

+2.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.37

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.79

1.72

+6.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

30.25

8.90

+21.35

LALT vs. DYTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LALT Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is higher than the DYTA Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LALT and DYTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LALTDYTADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.28

1.65

+1.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.62

1.11

+0.51

Drawdowns

LALT vs. DYTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LALT drawdown since its inception was -6.97%, smaller than the maximum DYTA drawdown of -9.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LALT and DYTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LALTDYTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-9.41%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-9.33%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.97%

-9.41%

+2.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.27%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.98%

-2.21%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

1.80%

-1.06%

Volatility

LALT vs. DYTA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) is 1.23%, while SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that LALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DYTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LALTDYTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

2.92%

-1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.40%

9.37%

-3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.81%

9.72%

-2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.78%

10.84%

-5.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.78%

10.84%

-5.06%

LALT vs. DYTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

LALT has a 1.94% expense ratio, which is higher than DYTA's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

LALT vs. DYTA - Dividend Comparison

LALT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than DYTA's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DYTA
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF
1.51%1.64%10.80%0.89%
LALT
First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF
3.68%2.03%2.06%2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


LALT and DYTA have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DYTA has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to LALT (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LALT dropped -6.97% vs DYTA's -9.41%.

On 3-year performance, DYTA leads with 12.06% vs 10.48% for LALT. On fees, DYTA is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, LALT has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DYTA has performed better with a 12.06% return vs 10.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DYTA is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.94% for LALT.

LALT has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.51% for DYTA.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Summit Global Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.94% for LALT and 1.04% for DYTA.

LALT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LALT and DYTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer