LAFFX vs. FMUSX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LAFFX (Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund) and FMUSX (Federated Hermes Municipal Ultra Short Fund) are both mutual funds - LAFFX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Lord Abbett, while FMUSX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Federated. Over the past 10 years, LAFFX returned 10.64%/yr vs 1.62%/yr for FMUSX. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. LAFFX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FMUSX.

Performance

LAFFX vs. FMUSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX) and Federated Hermes Municipal Ultra Short Fund (FMUSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAFFX achieves a 11.98% return, which is significantly higher than FMUSX's 0.75% return. Over the past 10 years, LAFFX has outperformed FMUSX with an annualized return of 10.64%, while FMUSX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.62% annualized return.

LAFFX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 7.16%
• YTD: 11.98%
• 1Y: 21.64%
• 3Y*: 16.98%
• 5Y*: 10.42%
• 10Y*: 10.64%
• ALL TIME*: 8.13%

FMUSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.20%
• 6M: 0.55%
• YTD: 0.75%
• 1Y: 1.26%
• 3Y*: 2.89%
• 5Y*: 1.95%
• 10Y*: 1.62%
• ALL TIME*: 8.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FMUSX Federated Hermes Municipal Ultra Short Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
LAFFX Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LAFFX vs. FMUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LAFFX Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund	11.98%	15.75%	17.30%	10.50%	-9.80%	26.77%	-1.29%	25.24%	-7.59%	16.16%
FMUSX Federated Hermes Municipal Ultra Short Fund	0.75%	3.47%	3.02%	3.40%	-0.62%	0.05%	1.12%	2.27%	1.46%	1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between LAFFX and FMUSX is 0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2000	-0.01

The correlation between LAFFX and FMUSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LAFFX vs. FMUSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LAFFX

LAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 80
LAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
LAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
LAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
LAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
LAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

FMUSX

FMUSX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FMUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FMUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FMUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
FMUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FMUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LAFFX vs. FMUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX) and Federated Hermes Municipal Ultra Short Fund (FMUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LAFFX	FMUSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	1.88	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	4.26	-1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	2.00	-0.67
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	4.56	-1.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.03	17.56	-6.54

LAFFX vs. FMUSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAFFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the FMUSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAFFX and FMUSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LAFFX vs. FMUSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAFFX drawdown since its inception was -60.50%, which is greater than FMUSX's maximum drawdown of -2.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAFFX and FMUSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAFFX	FMUSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.50%	-2.49%	-58.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.59%	-0.40%	-7.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.38%	-2.06%	-13.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.50%	-2.06%	-17.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.59%	-2.49%	-37.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.24%	-0.20%	-1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.99%	-0.16%	-8.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	0.10%	+1.71%

Volatility

LAFFX vs. FMUSX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to Federated Hermes Municipal Ultra Short Fund (FMUSX) at 0.20%. This indicates that LAFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LAFFX	FMUSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.47%	0.20%	+2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.39%	0.77%	+7.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.86%	0.96%	+9.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.52%	1.92%	+12.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.38%	1.46%	+15.92%

LAFFX vs. FMUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LAFFX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FMUSX's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

LAFFX vs. FMUSX - Dividend Comparison

LAFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, more than FMUSX's 1.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMUSX Federated Hermes Municipal Ultra Short Fund	1.45%	3.10%	2.67%	2.42%	0.88%	0.25%	0.90%	1.74%	1.55%	1.05%	0.83%	0.60%
LAFFX Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund	6.41%	7.49%	6.32%	1.69%	7.86%	3.86%	1.93%	4.31%	11.75%	11.96%	7.76%	10.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LAFFX and FMUSX in my portfolio?

LAFFX and FMUSX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LAFFX or FMUSX?

LAFFX has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to FMUSX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAFFX dropped -60.50% vs FMUSX's -2.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.