PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMUSX vs. FHIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMUSX vs. FHIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Municipal Ultra Short Fund (FMUSX) and Federated Hermes High Income Bond Fund (FHIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMUSX achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than FHIIX's 1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FMUSX has underperformed FHIIX with an annualized return of 1.65%, while FHIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.82% annualized return.


FMUSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.43%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.98%
1Y
1.93%
3Y*
3.05%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*
1.65%

FHIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.76%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.46%
1Y
5.27%
3Y*
7.57%
5Y*
3.21%
10Y*
4.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMUSX vs. FHIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMUSX
Federated Hermes Municipal Ultra Short Fund
0.72%3.47%3.02%3.40%-0.62%0.05%1.12%2.27%1.46%1.16%
FHIIX
Federated Hermes High Income Bond Fund
1.17%8.00%6.16%12.42%-11.74%4.68%5.90%14.35%-3.06%6.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FMUSX and FHIIX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2000

0.10

The correlation between FMUSX and FHIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMUSX vs. FHIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMUSX
FMUSX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FMUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FHIIX
FHIIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FHIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FHIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMUSX vs. FHIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Municipal Ultra Short Fund (FMUSX) and Federated Hermes High Income Bond Fund (FHIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMUSXFHIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.48

1.40

+1.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.96

2.17

+3.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.77

10.79

+13.98

FMUSX vs. FHIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMUSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the FHIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMUSX and FHIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMUSX vs. FHIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMUSX drawdown since its inception was -2.49%, smaller than the maximum FHIIX drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMUSX and FHIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMUSXFHIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.49%

-35.49%

+33.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.40%

-2.51%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.06%

-3.56%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.06%

-15.39%

+13.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-2.49%

-21.19%

+18.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.15%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-5.32%

+5.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

0.50%

+0.16%

Volatility

FMUSX vs. FHIIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Municipal Ultra Short Fund (FMUSX) is 0.34%, while Federated Hermes High Income Bond Fund (FHIIX) has a volatility of 0.74%. This indicates that FMUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMUSXFHIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

0.74%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.71%

2.42%

-1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97%

3.14%

-2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.91%

4.99%

-3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.46%

5.47%

-4.01%

FMUSX vs. FHIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMUSX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FHIIX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMUSX vs. FHIIX - Dividend Comparison

FMUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than FHIIX's 5.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHIIX
Federated Hermes High Income Bond Fund
5.47%5.29%5.36%5.50%5.70%4.60%4.97%5.28%5.75%5.29%5.14%5.94%
FMUSX
Federated Hermes Municipal Ultra Short Fund
1.71%3.10%2.67%2.42%0.88%0.25%0.90%1.74%1.55%1.05%0.83%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMUSX and FHIIX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHIIX has higher volatility (0.74%) compared to FMUSX (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMUSX dropped -2.49% vs FHIIX's -35.49%.

FMUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMUSX and FHIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer