LACG vs. LNOK

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

LACG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LAC Daily ETF) and LNOK (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long NOK ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LACG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for LNOK.

Performance

LACG vs. LNOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long LAC Daily ETF (LACG) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long NOK ETF (LNOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LACG

• 1D: -10.98%
• 1M: -58.19%
• 6M: -82.46%
• YTD: -69.05%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LNOK

• 1D: -15.23%
• 1M: -48.22%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LACG vs. LNOK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LACG Leverage Shares 2X Long LAC Daily ETF	-81.87%
LNOK Defiance Daily Target 2X Long NOK ETF	89.51%

Correlation

The correlation between LACG and LNOK is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2026	0.41

Return for Risk

LACG vs. LNOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long LAC Daily ETF (LACG) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long NOK ETF (LNOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

LACG vs. LNOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LACG drawdown since its inception was -85.36%, which is greater than LNOK's maximum drawdown of -66.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LACG and LNOK.

Drawdown Indicators

	LACG	LNOK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.36%	-66.00%	-19.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-85.36%	-66.00%	-19.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.05%	-13.83%	-34.22%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LACG	LNOK	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	146.89%	135.40%	+11.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	146.89%	135.40%	+11.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	146.89%	135.40%	+11.49%

LACG vs. LNOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

LACG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LNOK's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

LACG vs. LNOK - Dividend Comparison

Neither LACG nor LNOK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LACG and LNOK in my portfolio?

LACG and LNOK have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LACG or LNOK?

On fees, LACG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LACG or LNOK?

LACG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for LNOK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LACG or LNOK?

LACG and LNOK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between LACG and LNOK?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LACG and 1.31% for LNOK.