LACG vs. CRMG
LACG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LAC Daily ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
LACG vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LACG achieves a -36.90% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -71.26% return.
LACG
- 1D
- -8.56%
- 1M
- -32.82%
- YTD
- -36.90%
- 6M
- -47.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMG
- 1D
- 4.23%
- 1M
- -29.64%
- YTD
- -71.26%
- 6M
- -71.01%
- 1Y
- -73.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LACG vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LACG Leverage Shares 2X Long LAC Daily ETF | -36.90% | -27.29% |
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -71.26% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between LACG and CRMG is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LACG vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank
LACG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRMG
LACG vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long LAC Daily ETF (LACG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LACG | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.79 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.97 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LACG vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LACG drawdown since its inception was -71.00%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LACG and CRMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LACG | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.00% | -79.83% | +8.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -76.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.15% | -78.97% | +8.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.43% | -39.18% | -5.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 43.41% | — |
Volatility
LACG vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LACG | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 32.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 63.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 151.70% | 76.12% | +75.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 151.70% | 75.39% | +76.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 151.70% | 75.39% | +76.31% |
LACG vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LACG and CRMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
LACG vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison
Neither LACG nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LACG and CRMG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LACG and CRMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
LACG and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for LACG and CRMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer