LABU vs. SOXS
LABU (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares) and SOXS (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - LABU tracks the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%) while SOXS tracks the PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LABU returned -13.92%/yr vs -78.81%/yr for SOXS. At a correlation of -0.51, they often move in opposite directions. LABU charges 1.12%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SOXS.
Performance
LABU vs. SOXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LABU achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly higher than SOXS's -91.68% return. Over the past 10 years, LABU has outperformed SOXS with an annualized return of -13.92%, while SOXS has yielded a comparatively lower -78.81% annualized return.
LABU
- 1D
- -12.94%
- 1M
- -8.90%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 7.41%
- 1Y
- 193.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.21%
- 5Y*
- -33.29%
- 10Y*
- -13.92%
SOXS
- 1D
- -17.41%
- 1M
- -60.17%
- YTD
- -91.68%
- 6M
- -91.80%
- 1Y
- -97.83%
- 3Y*
- -86.41%
- 5Y*
- -79.75%
- 10Y*
- -78.81%
LABU vs. SOXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | -0.77% | 79.17% | -26.02% | -13.41% | -80.36% | -64.15% | 74.66% | 75.50% | -57.61% | 149.12% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | -91.68% | -85.53% | -59.55% | -84.56% | 15.76% | -80.94% | -92.90% | -83.81% | -19.39% | -69.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between LABU and SOXS is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015 | -0.51 |
The correlation between LABU and SOXS shifts across timeframes, from -0.51 (all time) to -0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LABU vs. SOXS — Risk / Return Rank
LABU
SOXS
LABU vs. SOXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LABU | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.57 | -0.96 | +3.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.91 | -3.97 | +6.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.58 | +0.76 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.09 | -1.00 | +8.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.95 | -1.39 | +22.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LABU | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | -0.96 | +3.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | -0.74 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.15 | -0.79 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | -0.79 | +0.55 |
Drawdowns
LABU vs. SOXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LABU drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABU and SOXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LABU | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.18% | -100.00% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.70% | -97.64% | +66.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.30% | -99.79% | +21.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.59% | -99.97% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.96% | -100.00% | +1.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.50% | -100.00% | +3.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.67% | -92.60% | +10.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.40% | 70.48% | -60.08% |
Volatility
LABU vs. SOXS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) is 28.40%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) has a volatility of 44.74%. This indicates that LABU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LABU | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.40% | 44.74% | -16.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.11% | 83.91% | -23.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.20% | 102.16% | -25.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.56% | 108.22% | -12.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.43% | 100.49% | -5.06% |
LABU vs. SOXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
LABU has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXS's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
LABU vs. SOXS - Dividend Comparison
LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than SOXS's 64.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.35% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.64% | 0.17% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | 64.90% | 10.79% | 5.45% | 9.22% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 2.30% | 0.76% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LABU and SOXS have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXS has higher volatility (44.74%) compared to LABU (28.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LABU dropped -99.18% vs SOXS's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, LABU leads with -13.92% vs -78.81% for SOXS. On fees, SOXS is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, LABU has been the lower-risk option at 28.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, LABU has performed better with a -13.92% return vs -78.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXS is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for LABU.
SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 64.90%, compared with 0.78% for LABU.
LABU tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%), while SOXS tracks PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 1.12% for LABU and 1.08% for SOXS.
LABU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LABU and SOXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer