PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LABU vs. PILL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LABU vs. PILL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares (PILL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABU achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly higher than PILL's -11.70% return.


LABU

1D
-12.94%
1M
-8.90%
YTD
-0.77%
6M
7.41%
1Y
193.25%
3Y*
6.21%
5Y*
-33.29%
10Y*
-13.92%

PILL

1D
-8.82%
1M
-15.56%
YTD
-11.70%
6M
6.13%
1Y
102.84%
3Y*
12.92%
5Y*
-12.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LABU vs. PILL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
-0.77%79.17%-26.02%-13.41%-80.36%-64.15%74.66%75.50%-57.61%16.89%
PILL
Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares
-11.70%75.14%-7.26%-12.06%-43.16%-37.33%0.28%19.26%-21.15%16.39%

Correlation

The correlation between LABU and PILL is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2017

0.77

The correlation between LABU and PILL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

LABU vs. PILL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LABU
PILL

Healthcare

99.8%
100.0%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

LABU
99.8%
PILL
100.0%

Financial Services

LABU
0.2%
PILL

-

Basic Materials

LABU
0.0%
PILL

-

Communication Services

LABU

-

PILL

-

Consumer Cyclical

LABU

-

PILL

-

Consumer Defensive

LABU

-

PILL

-

Energy

LABU

-

PILL

-

Industrials

LABU

-

PILL

-

Real Estate

LABU

-

PILL

-

Technology

LABU

-

PILL

-

Utilities

LABU

-

PILL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LABU vs. PILL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LABU
LABU Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

PILL
PILL Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PILL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PILL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PILL Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PILL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PILL Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LABU vs. PILL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares (PILL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LABUPILLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.57

1.68

+0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.91

2.26

+0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.27

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.09

3.28

+3.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.95

10.92

+10.02

LABU vs. PILL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LABU Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the PILL Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LABU and PILL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LABUPILLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

1.68

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.35

-0.21

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

-0.13

-0.12

Drawdowns

LABU vs. PILL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABU drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, which is greater than PILL's maximum drawdown of -88.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABU and PILL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LABUPILLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.18%

-88.76%

-10.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.70%

-33.21%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.30%

-60.43%

-17.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.59%

-83.38%

-14.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.50%

-69.74%

-26.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.67%

-58.53%

-23.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.40%

9.98%

+0.42%

Volatility

LABU vs. PILL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) has a higher volatility of 28.40% compared to Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares (PILL) at 20.61%. This indicates that LABU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PILL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LABUPILLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.40%

20.61%

+7.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.11%

48.73%

+11.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.20%

61.72%

+14.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.56%

60.41%

+35.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.43%

63.79%

+31.64%

LABU vs. PILL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LABU has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than PILL's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

LABU vs. PILL - Dividend Comparison

LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than PILL's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
0.78%0.84%0.35%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.64%0.17%
PILL
Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares
0.71%0.69%1.28%1.83%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.38%0.91%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


LABU and PILL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LABU has higher volatility (28.40%) compared to PILL (20.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LABU dropped -99.18% vs PILL's -88.76%.

On 5-year performance, PILL leads with -12.47% vs -33.29% for LABU. On fees, PILL is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, PILL has been the lower-risk option at 20.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PILL has performed better with a -12.47% return vs -33.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PILL is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for LABU.

LABU has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.71% for PILL.

LABU tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%), while PILL tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index. Their fees differ too: 1.12% for LABU and 0.98% for PILL.

LABU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LABU and PILL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer