PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LABU vs. NAIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LABU vs. NAIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares (NAIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABU achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly higher than NAIL's -14.74% return. Over the past 10 years, LABU has underperformed NAIL with an annualized return of -12.12%, while NAIL has yielded a comparatively higher 4.93% annualized return.


LABU

1D
6.80%
1M
-10.49%
YTD
6.64%
6M
8.23%
1Y
184.28%
3Y*
7.22%
5Y*
-35.06%
10Y*
-12.12%

NAIL

1D
11.51%
1M
7.40%
YTD
-14.74%
6M
-22.02%
1Y
-15.84%
3Y*
-10.68%
5Y*
-9.80%
10Y*
4.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LABU vs. NAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
6.64%79.17%-26.02%-13.41%-80.36%-64.15%74.66%75.50%-57.61%149.12%
NAIL
Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares
-14.74%-40.43%-22.83%259.61%-75.23%168.20%-32.08%184.63%-73.96%268.71%

Correlation

The correlation between LABU and NAIL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015

0.41

The correlation between LABU and NAIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LABU vs. NAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LABU
NAIL

Healthcare

99.8%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%
8.6%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

71.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

19.1%

Real Estate

-

0.5%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

LABU
99.8%
NAIL

-

Financial Services

LABU
0.2%
NAIL

-

Basic Materials

LABU
0.0%
NAIL
8.6%

Communication Services

LABU

-

NAIL

-

Consumer Cyclical

LABU

-

NAIL
71.8%

Consumer Defensive

LABU

-

NAIL

-

Energy

LABU

-

NAIL

-

Industrials

LABU

-

NAIL
19.1%

Real Estate

LABU

-

NAIL
0.5%

Technology

LABU

-

NAIL

-

Utilities

LABU

-

NAIL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LABU vs. NAIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LABU
LABU Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

NAIL
NAIL Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
NAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
NAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LABU vs. NAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares (NAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LABUNAILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.04

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.04

-0.23

+6.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.12

-0.41

+17.52

LABU vs. NAIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LABU Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the NAIL Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LABU and NAIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LABUNAILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

-0.18

+2.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

-0.11

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.13

0.06

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.23

0.01

-0.24

Drawdowns

LABU vs. NAIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABU drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, which is greater than NAIL's maximum drawdown of -93.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABU and NAIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LABUNAILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.18%

-93.75%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.70%

-67.85%

+37.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.30%

-82.09%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.59%

-84.40%

-13.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.96%

-93.75%

-5.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.24%

-75.64%

-20.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.67%

-43.83%

-37.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.81%

38.90%

-28.09%

Volatility

LABU vs. NAIL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) has a higher volatility of 29.37% compared to Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares (NAIL) at 23.86%. This indicates that LABU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LABUNAILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.37%

23.86%

+5.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.90%

61.34%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.11%

88.05%

-10.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.62%

87.10%

+8.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.44%

89.26%

+6.18%

LABU vs. NAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LABU has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than NAIL's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

LABU vs. NAIL - Dividend Comparison

LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than NAIL's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
0.72%0.84%0.35%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.64%0.17%
NAIL
Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares
0.93%1.55%0.63%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.17%0.35%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


LABU and NAIL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LABU has higher volatility (29.37%) compared to NAIL (23.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LABU dropped -99.18% vs NAIL's -93.75%.

On 10-year performance, NAIL leads with 4.93% vs -12.12% for LABU. On fees, NAIL is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, NAIL has been the lower-risk option at 23.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NAIL has performed better with a 4.93% return vs -12.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NAIL is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for LABU.

NAIL has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.72% for LABU.

LABU tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%), while NAIL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.12% for LABU and 0.99% for NAIL.

LABU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LABU and NAIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer