LABU vs. INTW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LABU (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. LABU is passively managed, while INTW is actively managed. Over the past year, LABU returned 324.35% vs 1964.55% for INTW. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LABU charges 1.12%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

LABU vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABU achieves a 47.57% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 750.22% return.

LABU

• 1D: 2.26%
• 1M: 34.26%
• YTD: 47.57%
• 6M: 36.98%
• 1Y: 324.35%
• 3Y*: 23.36%
• 5Y*: -31.01%
• 10Y*: -7.18%

INTW

• 1D: -12.49%
• 1M: 12.21%
• YTD: 750.22%
• 6M: 775.58%
• 1Y: 1,964.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LABU vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares	47.57%	85.66%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	750.22%	60.89%

Correlation

The correlation between LABU and INTW is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	0.36

LABU vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LABU	INTW
Healthcare	99.7%	-
Financial Services	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	0.0%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	66.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LABU vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LABU

LABU Risk / Return Rank: 91
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 78
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 95

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 98
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 94
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LABU vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LABU	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.15	13.25	-9.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.66	5.13	-1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.65	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.64	40.32	-29.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	29.90	91.49	-61.60

LABU vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LABU Sharpe Ratio is 4.15, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 13.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LABU and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LABU vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABU drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABU and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	LABU	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.18%	-60.58%	-38.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.70%	-49.34%	+18.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-78.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.80%	-12.49%	-82.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.72%	-29.66%	-52.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.91%	21.70%	-10.79%

Volatility

LABU vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) is 29.76%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 55.81%. This indicates that LABU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LABU	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.76%	55.81%	-26.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	63.07%	119.10%	-56.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	78.78%	150.14%	-71.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	95.94%	148.88%	-52.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.44%	148.88%	-53.44%

LABU vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

LABU has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

LABU vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares	0.52%	0.84%	0.35%	0.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.28%	0.64%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LABU and INTW in my portfolio?

LABU and INTW have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LABU or INTW?

INTW has higher volatility (55.81%) compared to LABU (29.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LABU dropped -99.18% vs INTW's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, LABU or INTW?

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1964.55% vs 324.35% for LABU. On fees, LABU is cheaper at 1.12% per year. On volatility, LABU has been the lower-risk option at 29.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LABU or INTW?

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1964.55% return vs 324.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LABU or INTW?

LABU is cheaper with a 1.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LABU or INTW?

LABU has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

What is the main difference between LABU and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.12% for LABU and 1.50% for INTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.25 vs 4.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.