LABFX vs. AOBLX
LABFX (Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund) and AOBLX (Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, LABFX returned 7.52%/yr vs 10.35%/yr for AOBLX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LABFX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for AOBLX.
Performance
LABFX vs. AOBLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LABFX achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly lower than AOBLX's 12.92% return. Over the past 10 years, LABFX has underperformed AOBLX with an annualized return of 7.52%, while AOBLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.35% annualized return.
LABFX
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 4.30%
- 1Y
- 13.51%
- 3Y*
- 13.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.38%
- 10Y*
- 7.52%
AOBLX
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 12.92%
- 6M
- 12.22%
- 1Y
- 29.60%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 9.02%
- 10Y*
- 10.35%
LABFX vs. AOBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LABFX Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund | 5.01% | 12.93% | 15.10% | 11.91% | -16.16% | 4.46% | 19.37% | 19.78% | -10.25% | 8.84% |
AOBLX Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A | 12.92% | 19.59% | 9.46% | 15.00% | -14.64% | 15.10% | 13.15% | 21.75% | -4.63% | 14.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between LABFX and AOBLX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 1996 | 0.92 |
The correlation between LABFX and AOBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LABFX vs. AOBLX — Risk / Return Rank
LABFX
AOBLX
LABFX vs. AOBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund (LABFX) and Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A (AOBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LABFX | AOBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.57 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 4.83 | -2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.06 | 22.31 | -12.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LABFX vs. AOBLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LABFX drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, which is greater than AOBLX's maximum drawdown of -36.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABFX and AOBLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LABFX | AOBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -36.70% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.10% | -6.42% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.38% | -13.52% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.26% | -20.48% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.26% | -24.31% | -1.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -1.38% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.17% | -3.81% | -1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.44% | 1.39% | +0.05% |
Volatility
LABFX vs. AOBLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund (LABFX) is 3.16%, while Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A (AOBLX) has a volatility of 3.69%. This indicates that LABFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LABFX | AOBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 3.69% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.69% | 7.85% | -1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.12% | 9.98% | -1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.43% | 11.16% | -0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.36% | 11.34% | +0.02% |
LABFX vs. AOBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LABFX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AOBLX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Dividends
LABFX vs. AOBLX - Dividend Comparison
LABFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than AOBLX's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOBLX Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A | 3.20% | 3.48% | 2.28% | 1.52% | 2.97% | 8.33% | 4.31% | 5.78% | 9.70% | 9.22% | 2.51% | 3.97% |
LABFX Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Balanced Opportunity Fund | 2.24% | 2.27% | 2.52% | 2.25% | 1.81% | 13.30% | 5.83% | 3.04% | 5.83% | 4.39% | 3.32% | 7.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, LABFX and AOBLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AOBLX has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to LABFX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LABFX dropped -41.58% vs AOBLX's -36.70%.
AOBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LABFX and AOBLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer