PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LABD vs. GGLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LABD vs. GGLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LABD vs. GGLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LABD
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares
-22.25%-70.07%-21.43%-41.77%-17.68%
GGLL
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares
-18.90%123.07%48.88%81.20%-30.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABD achieves a -22.25% return, which is significantly lower than GGLL's -18.90% return.


LABD

1D
-22.42%
1M
-7.39%
YTD
-22.25%
6M
-59.03%
1Y
-82.24%
3Y*
-55.49%
5Y*
-38.61%
10Y*
-57.45%

GGLL

1D
10.22%
1M
-16.24%
YTD
-18.90%
6M
28.40%
1Y
186.52%
3Y*
57.93%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LABD vs. GGLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LABD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than GGLL's 1.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LABD vs. GGLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LABD
LABD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
LABD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABD Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
LABD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

GGLL
GGLL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GGLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GGLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGLL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LABD vs. GGLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LABDGGLLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.96

3.08

-4.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.04

3.47

-5.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.43

-0.66

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

4.88

-5.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.17

18.04

-19.21

LABD vs. GGLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LABD Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the GGLL Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LABD and GGLL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LABDGGLLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.96

3.08

-4.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.54

0.75

-1.29

Correlation

The correlation between LABD and GGLL is -0.29. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

LABD vs. GGLL - Dividend Comparison

LABD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than GGLL's 5.63% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
LABD
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares
5.82%6.67%4.68%6.13%0.53%0.00%3.94%1.75%0.81%
GGLL
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares
5.63%4.16%3.29%2.05%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LABD vs. GGLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABD drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than GGLL's maximum drawdown of -52.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABD and GGLL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LABDGGLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-52.81%

-47.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-88.09%

-38.39%

-49.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-32.09%

-67.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.78%

-15.49%

-75.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

68.46%

10.38%

+58.08%

Volatility

LABD vs. GGLL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD) has a higher volatility of 36.88% compared to Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) at 18.25%. This indicates that LABD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LABDGGLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

36.88%

18.25%

+18.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.06%

39.37%

+19.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.11%

60.98%

+26.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

96.40%

55.13%

+41.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

96.40%

55.13%

+41.27%