PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
L.TO vs. SNEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

L.TO vs. SNEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) and StoneX Group Inc. (SNEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

L.TO is traded in CAD, while SNEX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SNEX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, L.TO achieves a 4.19% return, which is significantly lower than SNEX's 80.73% return. Over the past 10 years, L.TO has underperformed SNEX with an annualized return of 26.38%, while SNEX has yielded a comparatively higher 29.97% annualized return.


L.TO

1D
1.51%
1M
-2.79%
6M
2.69%
YTD
4.19%
1Y
16.84%
3Y*
33.86%
5Y*
32.00%
10Y*
26.38%
ALL TIME*
20.83%

SNEX

1D
-0.76%
1M
-18.85%
6M
59.82%
YTD
80.73%
1Y
82.59%
3Y*
64.02%
5Y*
45.96%
10Y*
29.97%
ALL TIME*
23.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$58.34MCA$76.10MCA$83.89M
CA$123.05MCA$163.25MCA$141.94M

L.TO vs. SNEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
L.TO
Loblaw Companies Limited
4.19%34.69%54.55%13.67%21.98%76.92%1.32%17.76%51.51%4.10%
SNEX
StoneX Group Inc.
80.73%39.00%43.93%13.44%65.45%5.73%15.76%27.99%-6.76%0.13%

Correlation

The correlation between L.TO and SNEX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2006

0.10

The correlation between L.TO and SNEX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

L.TO:

CA$74.90B

SNEX:

$8.83B

EPS

L.TO:

CA$3.10

SNEX:

$7.39

PE Ratio

L.TO:

20.74

SNEX:

10.05

PS Ratio

L.TO:

0.89

SNEX:

0.03

PB Ratio

L.TO:

6.95

SNEX:

2.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

L.TO:

CA$64.25B

SNEX:

$152.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

L.TO:

CA$19.91B

SNEX:

$47.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

L.TO:

CA$7.21B

SNEX:

$2.46B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

L.TO vs. SNEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

L.TO
L.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
L.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
L.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
L.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
L.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
L.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SNEX
SNEX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SNEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SNEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

L.TO vs. SNEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) and StoneX Group Inc. (SNEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


L.TOSNEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.32

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

3.13

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.61

8.92

-6.32

L.TO vs. SNEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current L.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the SNEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of L.TO and SNEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

L.TO vs. SNEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum L.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.67%, smaller than the maximum SNEX drawdown of -85.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L.TO and SNEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


L.TOSNEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.67%

-85.72%

+41.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.53%

-26.51%

+11.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.53%

-26.51%

+11.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.53%

-26.51%

+11.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.54%

-45.93%

+27.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.65%

-20.21%

+13.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-31.75%

+24.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.48%

9.28%

-2.80%

Volatility

L.TO vs. SNEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) is 5.85%, while StoneX Group Inc. (SNEX) has a volatility of 21.21%. This indicates that L.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


L.TOSNEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

21.21%

-15.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.06%

36.98%

-19.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.52%

47.09%

-25.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.08%

36.79%

-17.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.47%

37.59%

-17.12%

Dividends

L.TO vs. SNEX - Dividend Comparison

L.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while SNEX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
L.TO
Loblaw Companies Limited
0.90%2.19%4.20%5.43%5.28%5.40%8.15%7.40%6.45%7.84%7.27%7.61%
SNEX
StoneX Group Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

L.TO vs. SNEX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Loblaw Companies Limited and StoneX Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
14.48B
45.76B
(L.TO) Total Revenue
(SNEX) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. L.TO values in CAD, SNEX values in USD

L.TO vs. SNEX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Loblaw Companies Limited and StoneX Group Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
31.3%
99.1%
Portfolio components
L.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a gross profit of 4.54B and revenue of 14.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.

SNEX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, StoneX Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 45.35B and revenue of 45.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.1%.

L.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported an operating income of 1.01B and revenue of 14.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

SNEX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, StoneX Group Inc. reported an operating income of 45.32B and revenue of 45.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 99.0%.

L.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a net income of 594.00M and revenue of 14.48B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.

SNEX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, StoneX Group Inc. reported a net income of 174.30M and revenue of 45.76B, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


L.TO and SNEX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for L.TO and SNEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer