L.TO vs. QQC.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

L.TO (Loblaw Companies Limited) is a stock, while QQC.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, L.TO returned 29.84%/yr vs 21.44%/yr for QQC.TO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

L.TO vs. QQC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, L.TO achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly lower than QQC.TO's 22.09% return.

L.TO

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 2.15%
• 6M: 2.19%
• 1Y: 13.39%
• 3Y*: 31.22%
• 5Y*: 29.84%
• 10Y*: 18.49%

QQC.TO

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 10.83%
• YTD: 22.09%
• 6M: 18.58%
• 1Y: 42.69%
• 3Y*: 29.70%
• 5Y*: 21.44%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

L.TO vs. QQC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
L.TO Loblaw Companies Limited	2.15%	32.54%	50.14%	9.65%	18.16%	41.90%
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	22.09%	15.38%	35.73%	51.73%	-28.07%	25.01%

Correlation

The correlation between L.TO and QQC.TO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2021	0.12

The correlation between L.TO and QQC.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.12 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

L.TO vs. QQC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

L.TO

L.TO Risk / Return Rank: 59
L.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
L.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
L.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 54
L.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
L.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 62

QQC.TO

QQC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 77
QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
QQC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
QQC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 83
QQC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
QQC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

L.TO vs. QQC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	L.TO	QQC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	2.80	-2.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.99	3.64	-2.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.49	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.92	3.53	-2.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.20	11.21	-9.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

L.TO vs. QQC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current L.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of L.TO and QQC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	L.TO	QQC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65	2.80	-2.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.60	1.03	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.99	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	1.02	-0.33

Drawdowns

L.TO vs. QQC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum L.TO drawdown since its inception was -63.24%, which is greater than QQC.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L.TO and QQC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	L.TO	QQC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.24%	-31.81%	-31.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.53%	-12.14%	-2.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.53%	-22.59%	+8.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.53%	-31.81%	+17.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.48%	-0.46%	-8.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.85%	-8.05%	-6.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.10%	3.82%	+2.28%

Volatility

L.TO vs. QQC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.94% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) at 4.39%. This indicates that L.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	L.TO	QQC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.94%	4.39%	+3.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.57%	11.58%	+3.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.68%	15.33%	+5.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.78%	20.85%	-2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.74%	20.81%	-2.07%

Dividends

L.TO vs. QQC.TO - Dividend Comparison

L.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than QQC.TO's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
L.TO Loblaw Companies Limited	0.89%	0.89%	1.58%	2.14%	2.16%	2.32%	3.63%	3.34%	2.51%	1.57%	1.46%	1.52%
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	0.32%	0.39%	0.45%	0.54%	0.91%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both L.TO and QQC.TO in my portfolio?

L.TO and QQC.TO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.