PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
L.TO vs. IREN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

L.TO vs. IREN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) and IREN Limited (IREN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

L.TO is traded in CAD, while IREN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IREN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, L.TO achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly lower than IREN's 55.84% return.


L.TO

1D
-1.11%
1M
3.42%
YTD
2.62%
6M
2.89%
1Y
15.10%
3Y*
34.35%
5Y*
33.11%
10Y*
26.65%

IREN

1D
-4.65%
1M
2.96%
YTD
55.84%
6M
39.04%
1Y
462.16%
3Y*
137.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

L.TO vs. IREN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
L.TO
Loblaw Companies Limited
2.62%34.69%54.55%13.67%21.98%6.97%
IREN
IREN Limited
55.84%267.06%48.97%458.39%-91.78%-41.43%

Correlation

The correlation between L.TO and IREN is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021

0.02

Fundamentals

EPS

L.TO:

CA$3.72

IREN:

$0.45

PE Ratio

L.TO:

17.05

IREN:

125.41

PS Ratio

L.TO:

0.73

IREN:

12.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

L.TO:

CA$64.25B

IREN:

$757.07M

Gross Profit (TTM)

L.TO:

CA$19.91B

IREN:

$433.88M

EBITDA (TTM)

L.TO:

CA$7.21B

IREN:

-$173.05M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

L.TO vs. IREN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

L.TO
L.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
L.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
L.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
L.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
L.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
L.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

IREN
IREN Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
IREN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IREN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
IREN Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
IREN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IREN Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

L.TO vs. IREN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) and IREN Limited (IREN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


L.TOIRENDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.41

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

7.87

-6.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.43

14.59

-12.15

L.TO vs. IREN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current L.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the IREN Sharpe Ratio of 4.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of L.TO and IREN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

L.TO vs. IREN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum L.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.67%, smaller than the maximum IREN drawdown of -95.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L.TO and IREN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


L.TOIRENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.67%

-95.93%

+51.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.53%

-59.21%

+44.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.53%

-65.03%

+50.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.06%

-25.19%

+17.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.05%

-63.81%

+56.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.22%

31.89%

-25.67%

Volatility

L.TO vs. IREN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) is 6.47%, while IREN Limited (IREN) has a volatility of 30.31%. This indicates that L.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IREN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


L.TOIRENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.47%

30.31%

-23.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.19%

74.15%

-57.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.21%

103.06%

-81.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.94%

118.25%

-99.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.39%

118.25%

-97.86%

Dividends

L.TO vs. IREN - Dividend Comparison

L.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while IREN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IREN
IREN Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
L.TO
Loblaw Companies Limited
0.91%2.19%4.20%5.43%5.28%5.40%8.15%7.40%6.45%7.84%7.27%7.61%

Financials

L.TO vs. IREN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Loblaw Companies Limited and IREN Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
14.48B
208.24M
(L.TO) Total Revenue
(IREN) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. L.TO values in CAD, IREN values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


L.TO and IREN have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for L.TO and IREN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer